A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Kui [3 ]
Peng, Guang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Canc, Radiat Phys Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiotherapy, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Quality assurance; Gamma analysis; Leaf travel; VMAT VERIFICATION; DIODE-ARRAY; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; QA; RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; IMPLEMENTATION; TOMOTHERAPY; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is now widely used clinically, as it is capable of delivering a highly conformal dose distribution in a short time interval. We retrospectively analyzed patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of VMAT and examined the relationships between the planning parameters and the QA results. A total of 118 clinical VMAT cases underwent pretreatment QA. All plans had 3-dimensional diode array measurements, and 69 also had ion chamber measurements. Dose distribution and isocenter point dose were evaluated by comparing the measurements and the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. In addition, the relationship between QA results and several planning parameters, such as dose level, control points (CPs), monitor units (MUs), average field width, and average leaf travel, were also analyzed. For delivered dose distribution, a gamma analysis passing rate greater than 90% was obtained for all plans and greater than 95% for 100 of 118 plans with the 3%/3-mm criteria. The difference (mean +/- standard deviation) between the point doses measured by the ion chamber and those calculated by TPS was 0.9% +/- 2.0% for all plans. For all cancer sites, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer have the lowest and highest average passing rates, respectively. From multivariate linear regression analysis, the dose level (p = 0.001) and the average leaf travel (p < 0.001) showed negative correlations with the passing rate, and the average field width (p = 0.003) showed a positive correlation with the passing rate, all indicating a correlation between the passing rate and the plan complexity. No statistically significant correlation was found between MU or CP and the passing rate. Analysis of the results of dosimetric pretreatment measurements as a function of VMAT plan parameters can provide important information to guide the plan parameter setting and optimization in TPS. (C) 2014 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC THERAPY: EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT END-TO-END PATIENT-SPECIFIC QUALITY ASSURANCE
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Das, Shiva
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05): : 1567 - 1574
  • [2] A Systematic Approach to Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    SONG Yu-lin
    Ceferino Obcemea
    Boris Mueller
    Borys Mychalczak
    ChineseJournalofBiomedicalEngineering, 2015, 24 (02) : 58 - 65
  • [3] Prospective Clinical Validation of Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiation Therapy Plans
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Hirata, Emily
    Morin, Olivier
    Valdes, Gilmer
    Witztum, Alon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 113 (05): : 1091 - 1102
  • [4] A TPS integrated machine learning tool for predicting patient-specific quality assurance outcomes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Noblet, Caroline
    Maunet, Mathis
    Duthy, Marie
    Coste, Frederic
    Moreau, Matthieu
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 118
  • [5] Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Lambri, Nicola
    Dei, Damiano
    Goretti, Giulia
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Brioso, Ricardo Coimbra
    Pelizzoli, Marco
    Parabicoli, Sara
    Bresolin, Andrea
    Gallo, Pasqualina
    La Fauci, Francesco
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Paganini, Lucia
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Mancosu, Pietro
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [6] Electronic Portal Imaging Device in Pre-Treatment Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy delivery
    Lau, M. L.
    Abdullah, R.
    Jayamani, J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [7] Retrospective analysis of portal dosimetry pre-treatment quality assurance of prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans
    Maraghechi, Borna
    Davis, Jack
    Badu, Shyam
    Fleck, Andre
    Darko, Johnson
    Osei, Ernest
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [8] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Monte Carlo Dose Calculation and Elekta Log Files for Prostate Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy
    Katsuta, Yoshiyuki
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Fujita, Yukio
    Shimizu, Eiji
    Matsunaga, Kenichi
    Sawada, Kinya
    Matsushita, Haruo
    Majima, Kazuhiro
    Jingu, Keiichi
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 1220 - 1225
  • [9] Quality assurance-based optimization (QAO): Towards improving patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using machine learning
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 87 : 136 - 143
  • [10] Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Ahmed, Sharib
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Aouadi, Souha
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Hammoud, Rabih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (12) : 7891 - 7903