A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Kui [3 ]
Peng, Guang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Canc, Radiat Phys Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiotherapy, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Quality assurance; Gamma analysis; Leaf travel; VMAT VERIFICATION; DIODE-ARRAY; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; QA; RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; IMPLEMENTATION; TOMOTHERAPY; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is now widely used clinically, as it is capable of delivering a highly conformal dose distribution in a short time interval. We retrospectively analyzed patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of VMAT and examined the relationships between the planning parameters and the QA results. A total of 118 clinical VMAT cases underwent pretreatment QA. All plans had 3-dimensional diode array measurements, and 69 also had ion chamber measurements. Dose distribution and isocenter point dose were evaluated by comparing the measurements and the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. In addition, the relationship between QA results and several planning parameters, such as dose level, control points (CPs), monitor units (MUs), average field width, and average leaf travel, were also analyzed. For delivered dose distribution, a gamma analysis passing rate greater than 90% was obtained for all plans and greater than 95% for 100 of 118 plans with the 3%/3-mm criteria. The difference (mean +/- standard deviation) between the point doses measured by the ion chamber and those calculated by TPS was 0.9% +/- 2.0% for all plans. For all cancer sites, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer have the lowest and highest average passing rates, respectively. From multivariate linear regression analysis, the dose level (p = 0.001) and the average leaf travel (p < 0.001) showed negative correlations with the passing rate, and the average field width (p = 0.003) showed a positive correlation with the passing rate, all indicating a correlation between the passing rate and the plan complexity. No statistically significant correlation was found between MU or CP and the passing rate. Analysis of the results of dosimetric pretreatment measurements as a function of VMAT plan parameters can provide important information to guide the plan parameter setting and optimization in TPS. (C) 2014 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Patient-Specific Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Quality Assurance
    Bakhtiari, M.
    Kumaraswamy, L.
    de Boer, S.
    Malhotra, H.
    Podgorsak, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3087 - +
  • [12] A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Wang, Qingxin
    Dai, Jianrong
    Zhang, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (10)
  • [13] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram
    Low, Christopher
    Toye, Warren
    Phung, Peter
    Huston, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [14] Reduction of systematic dosimetric uncertainties in volumetric modulated arc therapy triggered by patient-specific quality assurance
    Mans, Anton
    Rozendaal, Roel
    Janssen, Tomas
    Damen, Eugene
    Kaas, Jochem
    van Mourik, Anke
    Mijnheer, Ben
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 6 - 10
  • [15] Comparison of action levels for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments
    Mancuso, Gordon M.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Gibbons, John P.
    Parker, Brent C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4378 - 4385
  • [16] Effect of Multileaf Collimator Leaf Position Error Determined by Picket Fence Test on Gamma Index Value in Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Ceylan, Cemile
    Inal, Serpil Yondem
    Senol, Elif
    Yilmaz, Berrin
    Sahin, Sevim
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [17] Sensitivity of Three Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Systems to MLC Aperture Errors With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Hu, Jinyou
    Gu, Shaoxian
    Wang, Ningyu
    Cui, Fengjie
    Zhang, Shengyuan
    Yin, Chuou
    Cai, Yunzhu
    Gou, Chengjun
    Zou, Lian
    Wu, Zhangwen
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [18] Cloud-Based Monte Carlo Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (QA) Method for Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): Clinical and Educational Impacts
    Chen, X.
    Xing, L.
    Mok, E.
    Luxton, G.
    Bush, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [19] Error detection model developed using a multi-task convolutional neural network in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Kimura, Yuto
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Oku, Yohei
    Kajikawa, Tomohiro
    Tomori, Seiji
    Jingu, Keiichi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (09) : 4769 - 4783
  • [20] Treatment Plan Complexity Quantification for Predicting Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Xudong, X.
    Ding, Y.
    Wei, W.
    Ma, C.
    Wang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E286 - E287