A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Kui [3 ]
Peng, Guang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Ctr Canc, Radiat Phys Ctr, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiotherapy, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; Quality assurance; Gamma analysis; Leaf travel; VMAT VERIFICATION; DIODE-ARRAY; IMRT; DOSIMETRY; QA; RADIOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; IMPLEMENTATION; TOMOTHERAPY; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is now widely used clinically, as it is capable of delivering a highly conformal dose distribution in a short time interval. We retrospectively analyzed patient-specific quality assurance (QA) of VMAT and examined the relationships between the planning parameters and the QA results. A total of 118 clinical VMAT cases underwent pretreatment QA. All plans had 3-dimensional diode array measurements, and 69 also had ion chamber measurements. Dose distribution and isocenter point dose were evaluated by comparing the measurements and the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations. In addition, the relationship between QA results and several planning parameters, such as dose level, control points (CPs), monitor units (MUs), average field width, and average leaf travel, were also analyzed. For delivered dose distribution, a gamma analysis passing rate greater than 90% was obtained for all plans and greater than 95% for 100 of 118 plans with the 3%/3-mm criteria. The difference (mean +/- standard deviation) between the point doses measured by the ion chamber and those calculated by TPS was 0.9% +/- 2.0% for all plans. For all cancer sites, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric cancer have the lowest and highest average passing rates, respectively. From multivariate linear regression analysis, the dose level (p = 0.001) and the average leaf travel (p < 0.001) showed negative correlations with the passing rate, and the average field width (p = 0.003) showed a positive correlation with the passing rate, all indicating a correlation between the passing rate and the plan complexity. No statistically significant correlation was found between MU or CP and the passing rate. Analysis of the results of dosimetric pretreatment measurements as a function of VMAT plan parameters can provide important information to guide the plan parameter setting and optimization in TPS. (C) 2014 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 313
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prediction of patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy using radiomics-based machine learning with dose distribution
    Ishizaka, Natsuki
    Kinoshita, Tomotaka
    Sakai, Madoka
    Tanabe, Shunpei
    Nakano, Hisashi
    Tanabe, Satoshi
    Nakamura, Sae
    Mayumi, Kazuki
    Akamatsu, Shinya
    Nishikata, Takayuki
    Takizawa, Takeshi
    Yamada, Takumi
    Sakai, Hironori
    Kaidu, Motoki
    Sasamoto, Ryuta
    Ishikawa, Hiroyuki
    Utsunomiya, Satoru
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [42] Error detection using a convolutional neural network with dose difference maps in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Kimura, Yuto
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Tomori, Seiji
    Oku, Yohei
    Jingu, Keiichi
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 73 : 57 - 64
  • [43] Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Prediction accuracy and cost-sensitive classification performance
    Li, Guangjun
    Duan, Lian
    Xie, Lizhang
    Hu, Ting
    Wei, Weige
    Bai, Long
    Xiao, Qing
    Liu, Wenjie
    Zhang, Lei
    Bai, Sen
    Yi, Zhang
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 125
  • [44] Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Xue, Xudong
    Luan, Shunyao
    Ding, Yi
    Li, Xiangbin
    Li, Dan
    Wang, Jingya
    Ma, Chi
    Jiang, Man
    Wei, Wei
    Wang, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [45] The sensitivity of gamma index analysis to detect multileaf collimator (MLC) positioning errors using Varian TrueBeam EPID and ArcCHECK for patient-specific prostate volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance
    Maraghechi, Borna
    Davis, Jack
    Mitchell, Nicholas
    Shah, Meeral
    Fleck, Andre
    Darko, Johnson
    Osei, Ernest
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (01) : 66 - 77
  • [46] Predicting gamma evaluation results of patient-specific head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy quality assurance based on multileaf collimator patterns and fluence map features: A feasibility study
    Thongsawad, Sangutid
    Srisatit, Somyot
    Fuangrod, Todsaporn
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (07):
  • [47] Establishing an optimized patient-specific verification program for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Serna, Alfredo
    Mata, Fernando
    Puchades, Vicente
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [48] Predicting deliverability of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans using aperture complexity analysis
    Younge, Kelly C.
    Roberts, Don
    Janes, Lindsay A.
    Anderson, Carlos
    Moran, Jean M.
    Matuszak, Martha M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04): : 124 - 131
  • [49] Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans
    Woon, Wui Ann
    Ravindran, Paul B.
    Ekayanake, Piyasiri
    Lim, Yivonne Yih Fang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [50] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187