Prospective Clinical Validation of Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiation Therapy Plans

被引:0
|
作者
Wall, Phillip D. H. [1 ]
Hirata, Emily [1 ]
Morin, Olivier [1 ]
Valdes, Gilmer [1 ]
Witztum, Alon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
IMRT QA; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; ERROR-DETECTION; COMPLEXITY; VMAT; CLASSIFICATION; DOSIMETRY; PERFORMANCE; ONCOLOGY; BEAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.040
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Performing measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is recognized as a resource-intensive and time inefficient task in the radiation therapy treatment workflow. Paired with technological refinements in modern radiation therapy, research toward measurement-free PSQA has seen increased interest during the past 5 years. However, these efforts have not been clinically implemented or prospectively validated in the United States. We propose a virtual QA (VQA) system and workflow to assess the safety and workload reduction of measurement-free PSQA. Methods: An XGBoost machine learning model was designed to predict PSQA outcomes of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, represented as percent differences between the measured ion chamber point dose in a phantom and the corresponding planned dose. The final model was deployed within a web application to predict PSQA outcomes of clinical plans within an existing clinical workflow. The application also displays relevant feature importance and plan-specific distribution analyses relative to database plans for documentation and to aid physicist interpretation and evaluation. VQA predictions were prospectively validated over 3 months of measurements at our clinic to assess safety and efficiency gains. Results: Over 3 months, VQA predictions for 445 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were prospectively validated at our institution. VQA predictions for these plans had a mean absolute error of 1.08% +/- 0.77%, with a maximum absolute error of 2.98%. Using a 1% prediction threshold (ie, plans predicted to have an absolute error <1% would not require a measurement) would yield a 69.2% reduction in QA workload, saving 32.5 hours per month on average, with 81.5% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.81 at a 3% clinical threshold and 100% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.93 at a 4% clinical threshold. Conclusions: This is the first prospective clinical implementation and validation of VQA in the United States, which we observed to be efficient. Using a conservative threshold, VQA can substantially reduce the number of required measurements for PSQA, leading to more effective allocation of clinical resources. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1102
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans
    Li, Guangjun
    Wu, Kui
    Peng, Guang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Bai, Sen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [2] A Systematic Approach to Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    SONG Yu-lin
    Ceferino Obcemea
    Boris Mueller
    Borys Mychalczak
    Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 24 (02) : 58 - 65
  • [3] Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Ahmed, Sharib
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Aouadi, Souha
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Hammoud, Rabih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (12) : 7891 - 7903
  • [4] Comparison of action levels for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments
    Mancuso, Gordon M.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Gibbons, John P.
    Parker, Brent C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4378 - 4385
  • [5] Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Lambri, Nicola
    Dei, Damiano
    Goretti, Giulia
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Brioso, Ricardo Coimbra
    Pelizzoli, Marco
    Parabicoli, Sara
    Bresolin, Andrea
    Gallo, Pasqualina
    La Fauci, Francesco
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Paganini, Lucia
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Mancosu, Pietro
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [6] Effect of dose grid resolution on the results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Chun, M.
    Kim, J., I
    Oh, G. H.
    Wu, H. G.
    Park, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (03): : 521 - 530
  • [7] Dosimetric Validation for Patient-specific Quality Assurance using the Delta44 Phantom with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Arino Gil, A.
    Calvo, O.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Papanikolau, N.
    Hdez-Armas, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S717 - S717
  • [8] Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Patient-Specific Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Quality Assurance
    Bakhtiari, M.
    Kumaraswamy, L.
    de Boer, S.
    Malhotra, H.
    Podgorsak, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3087 - +
  • [9] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram
    Low, Christopher
    Toye, Warren
    Phung, Peter
    Huston, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [10] Reduction of systematic dosimetric uncertainties in volumetric modulated arc therapy triggered by patient-specific quality assurance
    Mans, Anton
    Rozendaal, Roel
    Janssen, Tomas
    Damen, Eugene
    Kaas, Jochem
    van Mourik, Anke
    Mijnheer, Ben
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 6 - 10