Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system

被引:9
|
作者
Marshall, Nicholas W. [1 ]
van Ongeval, Chantal [1 ]
Bosmans, Hilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Mammography; Image quality; Detector characterization; IMAGE QUALITY MEASUREMENTS; BREAST SCREENING-PROGRAM; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; NOISE; PART; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; VARIANCE; SOFTWARE; CONTRAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A retrofit flat panel detector was integrated with a GE DMR+ analog mammography system and characterized using detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Technical system performance was evaluated using the European Guidelines protocol, followed by a limited evaluation of clinical image quality for 20 cases using image quality criteria in the European Guidelines. Optimal anode/filter selections were established using signal difference-to-noise ratio measurements. Only small differences in peak DQE were seen between the three anode/filter settings, with an average value of 0.53. For poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thicknesses above 60 mm, the Rh/Rh setting was the optimal anode/filter setting. The system required a mean glandular dose of 0.54 mGy at 30 kV Rh/Rh to reach the Acceptable gold thickness limit for 0.1 mm details. Imaging performance of the retrofit unit with the GE DMR+ is notably better than of powder based computed radiography systems and is comparable to current flat panel FFDM systems. (C) 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 322
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a digital X-ray detector based on a phosphor-coated CCD for mammography
    Taibi, A
    DelGuerra, A
    Gambaccini, M
    Marziani, M
    Tuffanelli, A
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1997, 392 (1-3): : 210 - 213
  • [22] On the Performance of Hadamard Ratio Detector-Based Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios
    Sedighi, Saeid
    Taherpour, Abbas
    Sala-Alvarez, Josep
    Khattab, Tamer
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 63 (14) : 3809 - 3824
  • [23] Real time flat panel detector-based volume tomographic angiography imaging: Detector evaluation
    Ning, RL
    Colbeth, R
    Chen, B
    Yu, RF
    Conover, D
    Ning, Y
    Blouir, C
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 3977 : 396 - 407
  • [24] Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: System evaluation
    Ning, R
    Chen, B
    Yu, RF
    Conover, D
    Tang, XY
    Ning, Y
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (09) : 949 - 963
  • [25] Evaluation of a direct conversion full-field digital mammography detector
    Lee, DL
    Yorker, JG
    Jing, Z
    Hoffberg, MG
    Jeromin, LS
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 463 - 464
  • [26] A novel digital mammography detector concept based on microchannel plates
    Shikhaliev, PM
    Xu, T
    Le, H
    Molloi, S
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1455 - 1456
  • [27] Development and characterization of a flat-panel detector-based microtomography system
    Lee, SC
    Kim, HK
    Chun, IK
    Cho, MH
    Cho, MH
    Lee, SY
    ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 : 245 - 251
  • [28] Direct conversion detector for digital mammography
    Polischuk, B
    Rougeot, H
    Wong, K
    Debrie, A
    Poliquin, E
    Hansroul, M
    Martin, JP
    Truong, TT
    Choquette, M
    Laperrière, L
    Shukri, Z
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 417 - 425
  • [29] Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system
    Marshall, N. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (21): : 5655 - 5673
  • [30] Performance evaluation of a digital reading station for screening mammography
    Roelofs, T
    van Woudenberg, S
    Hendriks, J
    Bödicker, A
    Evertsz, C
    Karssemeijer, N
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 455 - 459