Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system

被引:9
|
作者
Marshall, Nicholas W. [1 ]
van Ongeval, Chantal [1 ]
Bosmans, Hilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
Mammography; Image quality; Detector characterization; IMAGE QUALITY MEASUREMENTS; BREAST SCREENING-PROGRAM; FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; NOISE; PART; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; VARIANCE; SOFTWARE; CONTRAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A retrofit flat panel detector was integrated with a GE DMR+ analog mammography system and characterized using detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Technical system performance was evaluated using the European Guidelines protocol, followed by a limited evaluation of clinical image quality for 20 cases using image quality criteria in the European Guidelines. Optimal anode/filter selections were established using signal difference-to-noise ratio measurements. Only small differences in peak DQE were seen between the three anode/filter settings, with an average value of 0.53. For poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) thicknesses above 60 mm, the Rh/Rh setting was the optimal anode/filter setting. The system required a mean glandular dose of 0.54 mGy at 30 kV Rh/Rh to reach the Acceptable gold thickness limit for 0.1 mm details. Imaging performance of the retrofit unit with the GE DMR+ is notably better than of powder based computed radiography systems and is comparable to current flat panel FFDM systems. (C) 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 322
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Detector-based visual identification of known objects
    Khachaturov, G
    ENHANCED AND SYNTHETIC VISION 2000, 2000, 4023 : 269 - 279
  • [42] The NIST detector-based luminous intensity scale
    Cromer, CL
    Eppeldauer, G
    Hardis, JE
    Larason, TC
    Ohno, Y
    Parr, AC
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 101 (02) : 109 - 132
  • [43] Results from source-based and detector-based calibrations of a CLARREO Calibration Demonstration System
    Angal, Amit
    McCorkel, Joel
    Thome, Kurt
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XXI, 2016, 9972
  • [44] Performance evaluation of a flat-panel filmless full-field digital mammography system
    Rougeot, HM
    OpsahlOng, B
    Castleberry, DE
    Langberg, C
    Liu, J
    KimmeSmith, CM
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 341 - 341
  • [45] Spatial frequency dependent DQE performance of a CsI:Tl based X-ray detector for digital mammography
    Jing, ZX
    Huda, W
    Walker, JK
    Choi, WY
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 159 - 168
  • [46] Hybrid detector technology applied to digital mammography
    Roehrig, H
    Gaalema, S
    Sharma, SRD
    Yorke, WE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 19, PTS 1-6: MAGNIFICENT MILESTONES AND EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES IN MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 19 : 731 - 734
  • [47] Comparison of different detector materials for digital mammography
    Ford, NL
    Mainprize, JG
    Yaffe, MJ
    Yin, S
    Tümer, T
    Gordon, EE
    Hamilton, WJ
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 39 - 44
  • [48] Evaluation based on breast tomosynthesis of amorphous selenium full field digital mammography system
    Varjonen, M
    Strommer, P
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1897 - 1897
  • [49] Digital Mammography Detector QC, Tips and Problems
    Berns, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [50] Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France
    Stines, J.
    Noel, A.
    Heid, P.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (7-8): : 933 - 942