What is the "Optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

被引:35
|
作者
Senges-Becker, JC
Klostermann, M
Becker, R
Bauer, A
Siegler, KE
Katus, HA
Schoels, W
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Cardiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Biometrie Abt, Ludwigshafen, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
implantable cardioverter defibrillator routine follow-up; complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the absence of comparative studies, recommended routine follow-up (FU) intervals for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients range from 1 to 6 months; most patients are followed at 3 month intervals. Methods Six hundred and eighteen ICD patients were routinely seen 4 weeks after implant and then every 3 months. Unplanned visits (UPV) were either patient initiated or due to manufacturer recalls. FU visits included patient history/ examination, ICD interrogation, pacing/sensing threshold and pacing/shock impedance. Chest X-rays were performed every 6 months. To validate FU interval recommendations, a comparative analysis on the detection of complications was performed, relying either on the information of every, or of every other FU visit, i.e., on 3 or 6 month intervals. Results During 3.3 +/- 2.8 years, 137 complications occurred in 110 patients (17%). However, identification of only 34% was dependent on the FU schedule, since the mode of detection was ICD interrogation in 38 and history/ physical examination in nine patients. The remainder was diagnosed by UPV in 47, manufacturer recall in seven, accidental discovery during device replacement in two, and routine X-ray in 34 patients. Complication free survival at 2 years was 86.4% for patients implanted before 1999, and 89.2% thereafter (P = 0.003). Regarding 6 rather than 3 month FU intervals, a theoretical maximum delay of 3 months in the detection of potentially life-threatening complications would have occurred in 1.7% of all. patients. For those implanted after 1999, this related to only 0.9%. Conclusions ICD-retated complications detected during routine FU visits are relatively rare, particularly with newer generation ICD systems. Thus, 6 month FU intervals appear to be safe. With new developments such as patient alert features and telemedicat data transmission, FU intervals in ICD clinics might even be further extended. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 326
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] External validation of the "optimal PSA follow-up schedule after radical prostatectomy” in a new cohort
    Yoshinori Yanai
    Kazuhiro Matsumoto
    Takeo Kosaka
    Toshikazu Takeda
    Nobuyuki Tanaka
    Shinya Morita
    Ryuichi Mizuno
    Toshiaki Shinojima
    Hiroshi Asanuma
    Mototsugu Oya
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 25 : 1393 - 1397
  • [32] Postoperative Care and Follow-up Schedule for Intermittent Exotropia
    Suh, Young-Woo
    Ha, Suk-Gyu
    Lee, Jong-Suk
    Jang, Sung-Min
    Kim, Seung-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2016, 53 (04) : 253 - 254
  • [33] ICD-Therapie 2011Optimales Follow-up und Eingreifen bei akuten FehlfunktionenICD therapy 2011Optimal follow-up and troubleshooting
    T. Weinmann
    L. Károlyi
    S.G. Spitzer
    Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, 2011, 25 (6) : 331 - 336
  • [34] Optimal follow-up of stage I colorectal cancer patients
    Higuchi, Tetsuro
    Enomoto, Masayuki
    Sugihara, Kenichi
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (04) : A867 - A867
  • [35] THE OPTIMAL FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTATIC-CANCER AFTER OPTIMAL TREATMENT
    NEWLING, DWW
    PATHOLOGIE BIOLOGIE, 1994, 42 (01): : 58 - 59
  • [36] WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE FOLLOW-UP FOR BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    GUASTALLA, JP
    KERBRAT, P
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1995, 24 (31): : 1415 - 1417
  • [37] The impact of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: the Leiden follow-up study of ICD patients and their partners
    de Groot, NMS
    van Erven, L
    Schalij, M
    van der Wall, EE
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 : 259 - 259
  • [38] FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS
    GISH, O
    ETHIOPIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 22 (01) : 68 - 68
  • [39] TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL END POINT ON FOLLOW-UP BIOPSY?
    Dhaliwal, H. K.
    Hoeroldt, B. S.
    Dube, A.
    McFarlane, E.
    Karajeh, M. A.
    Gleeson, D. C.
    GUT, 2011, 60 : A229 - A229
  • [40] ON THEORY OF OPTIMAL FOLLOW-UP SCHEME
    KELENDZHERIDZE, D
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1961, 138 (03): : 529 - +