What is the "Optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

被引:35
|
作者
Senges-Becker, JC
Klostermann, M
Becker, R
Bauer, A
Siegler, KE
Katus, HA
Schoels, W
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Cardiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Biometrie Abt, Ludwigshafen, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
implantable cardioverter defibrillator routine follow-up; complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the absence of comparative studies, recommended routine follow-up (FU) intervals for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients range from 1 to 6 months; most patients are followed at 3 month intervals. Methods Six hundred and eighteen ICD patients were routinely seen 4 weeks after implant and then every 3 months. Unplanned visits (UPV) were either patient initiated or due to manufacturer recalls. FU visits included patient history/ examination, ICD interrogation, pacing/sensing threshold and pacing/shock impedance. Chest X-rays were performed every 6 months. To validate FU interval recommendations, a comparative analysis on the detection of complications was performed, relying either on the information of every, or of every other FU visit, i.e., on 3 or 6 month intervals. Results During 3.3 +/- 2.8 years, 137 complications occurred in 110 patients (17%). However, identification of only 34% was dependent on the FU schedule, since the mode of detection was ICD interrogation in 38 and history/ physical examination in nine patients. The remainder was diagnosed by UPV in 47, manufacturer recall in seven, accidental discovery during device replacement in two, and routine X-ray in 34 patients. Complication free survival at 2 years was 86.4% for patients implanted before 1999, and 89.2% thereafter (P = 0.003). Regarding 6 rather than 3 month FU intervals, a theoretical maximum delay of 3 months in the detection of potentially life-threatening complications would have occurred in 1.7% of all. patients. For those implanted after 1999, this related to only 0.9%. Conclusions ICD-retated complications detected during routine FU visits are relatively rare, particularly with newer generation ICD systems. Thus, 6 month FU intervals appear to be safe. With new developments such as patient alert features and telemedicat data transmission, FU intervals in ICD clinics might even be further extended. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 326
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT - WHAT IS NECESSARY
    GALLMEIER, WM
    MUNCHENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1981, 123 (44): : 1643 - 1643
  • [42] What follow-up after revascularization?
    Vaillant-Roussel, Helene
    Cadwallader, Jean-Sebastien
    Ruelle, Yannick
    EXERCER-LA REVUE FRANCOPHONE DE MEDECINE GENERALE, 2022, (188): : 479 - 479
  • [43] Risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with serrated lesions depending on follow-up schedule
    Labelle, Juliette
    Djinbachian, Roupen
    Pohl, Heiko
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Medawar, Edgard
    Panzini, Benoit
    Bouin, Mickael
    Bernard, Edmond-Jean
    von Renteln, Daniel
    GUT, 2025,
  • [44] Follow-up schedule based on evidence of melanoma recurrences in 200 patients, a monoinstitutional experience
    Mangiola, D.
    Brugnara, S.
    Ferro, A.
    Sicher, M.
    Bertolin, M.
    Triolo, R.
    Veccia, A.
    Dipasquale, M.
    Caffo, O.
    Galligioni, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [45] Registry on linked follow-up of ICD patients by means of home monitoring. Experience with the first patients
    Perings, S.
    Blaese, I.
    Plehn, G.
    Perings, C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 18 : S96 - S96
  • [46] Registry on Linked Follow-Up of ICD Patients by Means of Home Monitoring. Experience with the First Patients
    Perings, S. M.
    Blaese, I.
    Marx, R.
    Plehn, G.
    Mueller, C.
    Trappe, H. -J.
    Perings, C.
    JOURNAL FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2008, 15 (1-2): : 17 - 22
  • [47] Close monitoring and lifetime follow-up is optimal for patients with a history of melanoma
    Christianson, DF
    Anderson, CM
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [48] Determining Optimal Follow-up for Patients With Anal Cancer Following Chemoradiation
    Frazer, Marissa L.
    Yang, George
    Felder, Seth
    McDonald, Jordan
    Sanchez, Julian
    Dessureault, Sophie
    Imanirad, Iman
    Carballido, Estrella
    Kim, Richard D.
    Hoffe, Sarah E.
    Frakes, Jessica M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 43 (05): : 319 - 324
  • [49] Appropriate ICD therapy in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy -: Long-term follow-up
    Karaoguz, Remzi
    Maydanozcu, Sevgul
    Altun, Timucin
    Guldal, Muharrem
    Akyurek, Omer
    Erol, Cetin
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 47 (05) : 763 - 773
  • [50] 5-year follow-up on ICD patients with electrical storm: a single center experience
    Becker, T.
    Kleemann, T.
    Vater, M.
    Doenges, K.
    Senges, J.
    Seidl, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 38 - 38