What is the "Optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

被引:35
|
作者
Senges-Becker, JC
Klostermann, M
Becker, R
Bauer, A
Siegler, KE
Katus, HA
Schoels, W
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Cardiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Biometrie Abt, Ludwigshafen, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
implantable cardioverter defibrillator routine follow-up; complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the absence of comparative studies, recommended routine follow-up (FU) intervals for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients range from 1 to 6 months; most patients are followed at 3 month intervals. Methods Six hundred and eighteen ICD patients were routinely seen 4 weeks after implant and then every 3 months. Unplanned visits (UPV) were either patient initiated or due to manufacturer recalls. FU visits included patient history/ examination, ICD interrogation, pacing/sensing threshold and pacing/shock impedance. Chest X-rays were performed every 6 months. To validate FU interval recommendations, a comparative analysis on the detection of complications was performed, relying either on the information of every, or of every other FU visit, i.e., on 3 or 6 month intervals. Results During 3.3 +/- 2.8 years, 137 complications occurred in 110 patients (17%). However, identification of only 34% was dependent on the FU schedule, since the mode of detection was ICD interrogation in 38 and history/ physical examination in nine patients. The remainder was diagnosed by UPV in 47, manufacturer recall in seven, accidental discovery during device replacement in two, and routine X-ray in 34 patients. Complication free survival at 2 years was 86.4% for patients implanted before 1999, and 89.2% thereafter (P = 0.003). Regarding 6 rather than 3 month FU intervals, a theoretical maximum delay of 3 months in the detection of potentially life-threatening complications would have occurred in 1.7% of all. patients. For those implanted after 1999, this related to only 0.9%. Conclusions ICD-retated complications detected during routine FU visits are relatively rare, particularly with newer generation ICD systems. Thus, 6 month FU intervals appear to be safe. With new developments such as patient alert features and telemedicat data transmission, FU intervals in ICD clinics might even be further extended. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 326
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Optimal follow-up of cervical cancer patients
    Vrdoljak E.
    Boraska Jelavić T.
    Petrić Miše B.
    Omrčen T.
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology, 2015, 8 (1) : 66 - 70
  • [12] WHAT MATTERS IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY
    PITTS, J
    ARSTALL, S
    BILSTON, A
    PRACTITIONER, 1989, 233 (1464) : 293 - 294
  • [13] OPTIMAL FOLLOW-UP IN COLORECTAL-CANCER PATIENTS - WHAT TESTS AND HOW OFTEN
    KRONBORG, O
    SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 10 (03): : 217 - 224
  • [14] Home Monitoring™ technology and integrated follow-up care of ICD patients
    Perings, Stefan M.
    Perings, Christian
    Smetak, Norbert
    Meyer, Christian
    Shin, Dong-In
    Kelm, Malte
    Brachmann, Johannes
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2013, 68 (04) : 381 - 386
  • [15] Aggressive follow-up of patients with Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: What is optimal?
    Tompkins, KA
    Dryver, ET
    Imrie, KR
    BLOOD, 2001, 98 (11) : 235B - 235B
  • [16] Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) follow-up
    Gwechenberger, M.
    JOURNAL FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2023, 30 (11-12): : 276 - 280
  • [17] Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures: What Is the Optimal Follow-Up Period?
    Green, John
    Watson, John Tracy
    Shaheen, Philip
    Kuldjanov, Djoldas
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2023, 37 (11) : 557 - 561
  • [18] Optimal programming of the ICD in children and young adults on the basis of long term follow-up
    Lewandowski, M.
    Przybylski, A.
    Syska, P.
    Sterlinski, M.
    Maciag, A.
    Szwed, H.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E426 - E426
  • [19] Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?
    Sickles, EA
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [20] Do Patients Get Follow-Up Studies on Schedule? Analysis of the Follow-Up Timeline for Pulmonary Nodules Using PRESTO
    Cook, T.
    Itri, J.
    Boonn, W.
    Kim, W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)