What is the "Optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

被引:35
|
作者
Senges-Becker, JC
Klostermann, M
Becker, R
Bauer, A
Siegler, KE
Katus, HA
Schoels, W
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Cardiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Biometrie Abt, Ludwigshafen, Germany
来源
EUROPACE | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
implantable cardioverter defibrillator routine follow-up; complications;
D O I
10.1016/j.eupc.2005.02.117
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the absence of comparative studies, recommended routine follow-up (FU) intervals for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients range from 1 to 6 months; most patients are followed at 3 month intervals. Methods Six hundred and eighteen ICD patients were routinely seen 4 weeks after implant and then every 3 months. Unplanned visits (UPV) were either patient initiated or due to manufacturer recalls. FU visits included patient history/ examination, ICD interrogation, pacing/sensing threshold and pacing/shock impedance. Chest X-rays were performed every 6 months. To validate FU interval recommendations, a comparative analysis on the detection of complications was performed, relying either on the information of every, or of every other FU visit, i.e., on 3 or 6 month intervals. Results During 3.3 +/- 2.8 years, 137 complications occurred in 110 patients (17%). However, identification of only 34% was dependent on the FU schedule, since the mode of detection was ICD interrogation in 38 and history/ physical examination in nine patients. The remainder was diagnosed by UPV in 47, manufacturer recall in seven, accidental discovery during device replacement in two, and routine X-ray in 34 patients. Complication free survival at 2 years was 86.4% for patients implanted before 1999, and 89.2% thereafter (P = 0.003). Regarding 6 rather than 3 month FU intervals, a theoretical maximum delay of 3 months in the detection of potentially life-threatening complications would have occurred in 1.7% of all. patients. For those implanted after 1999, this related to only 0.9%. Conclusions ICD-retated complications detected during routine FU visits are relatively rare, particularly with newer generation ICD systems. Thus, 6 month FU intervals appear to be safe. With new developments such as patient alert features and telemedicat data transmission, FU intervals in ICD clinics might even be further extended. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 326
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEFINING THE OPTIMAL FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULE FOLLOWING SURGICAL RESECTION OF GRADE I MENINGIOMA
    Chavredakis, Emmanuel
    Brodbelt, Andrew
    Jenkinson, Michael
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16
  • [22] TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITIS: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL ENDPOINT ON FOLLOW-UP BIOPSY?
    Dhaliwal, H. K.
    Hoeroldt, B.
    Dube, A.
    Mcfarlane, E.
    Karajeh, M. A.
    Gleeson, D. C.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 54 : S508 - S509
  • [23] What is a crystal? - follow-up
    Ben-Abraham, Shelomo I.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KRISTALLOGRAPHIE, 2007, 222 (10): : 566 - 566
  • [24] Routine arrhythmia inductions for ICD follow-up: Are they obsolete?
    Glikson, M
    Friedman, P
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (06): : 915 - 920
  • [25] Designing a Rational Follow-Up Schedule for Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma
    Wilson, David A. J.
    Gazendam, Aaron
    Visgauss, Julia
    Perrin, David
    Griffin, Anthony M.
    Chung, Peter W.
    Catton, Charles N.
    Shultz, David
    Ferguson, Peter C.
    Wunder, Jay S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 2033 - 2041
  • [26] Designing a Rational Follow-Up Schedule for Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma
    David A. J. Wilson
    Aaron Gazendam
    Julia Visgauss
    David Perrin
    Anthony M. Griffin
    Peter W. Chung
    Charles N. Catton
    David Shultz
    Peter C. Ferguson
    Jay S. Wunder
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 2033 - 2041
  • [27] Follow-up of CRT-ICD: Implications for the use of remote follow-up systems. Data from the InSync ICD Italian registry
    Lunati, Maurizio
    Gasparini, Maurizio
    Santini, Massimo
    Landolina, Maurizio
    Perego, Giovanni B.
    Pappone, Carlo
    Marzegalli, Maurzio
    Argiolas, Carlo
    Murthy, Anant
    Valsecchi, Sergio
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (01): : 38 - 46
  • [28] Management of melanoma patients: Benefit of intense follow-up schedule is not demonstrated - Reply
    Garbe, C
    Leiter, U
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (19) : 3707 - 3708
  • [29] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE "OPTIMAL PSA FOLLOW-UP SCHEDULE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY" IN A NEW COHORT
    Yanai, Yoshinori
    Matsumoto, Kazuhiro
    Kosaka, Takeo
    Tanaka, Nobuyuki
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Morita, Shinya
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Shinojima, Toshiaki
    Asanuma, Hiroshi
    Oya, Mototsugu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E298 - E299
  • [30] External validation of the "optimal PSA follow-up schedule after radical prostatectomy" in a new cohort
    Yanai, Yoshinori
    Matsumoto, Kazuhiro
    Kosaka, Takeo
    Takeda, Toshikazu
    Tanaka, Nobuyuki
    Morita, Shinya
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Shinojima, Toshiaki
    Asanuma, Hiroshi
    Oya, Mototsugu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 25 (07) : 1393 - 1397