Characterization of proton pencil beam scanning and passive beam using a high spatial resolution solid-state microdosimeter

被引:56
|
作者
Tran, Linh T. [1 ]
Chartier, Lachlan [1 ]
Bolst, David [1 ]
Pogossov, Alex [1 ]
Guatelli, Susanna [1 ]
Petasecca, Marco [1 ]
Lerch, Michael L. F. [1 ]
Prokopovich, Dale A. [2 ]
Reinhard, Mark I. [2 ]
Clasie, Benjamin [3 ]
Depauw, Nicolas [3 ]
Kooy, Hanne [3 ]
Flanz, Jacob B. [3 ]
McNamara, Aimee [3 ]
Paganetti, Harald [3 ]
Beltran, Chris [4 ]
Furutani, Keith [4 ]
Perevertaylo, Vladimir L. [5 ]
Jackson, Michael [6 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Australian Nucl Sci & Technol Org, Lucas Heights, Australia
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] SPA BIT, Kiev, Ukraine
[6] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
3D sensitive volume; microdosimetry; pencil beam scanning (PBS); proton therapy; RBE; silicon on insulator (SOI); RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; RADIATION-FIELDS; CELL-SURVIVAL; C-12; ION; RBE; SILICON; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12563
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This work aims to characterize a proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) and passive double scattering (DS) systems as well as to measure parameters relevant to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of the beam using a silicon on insulator (SOI) microdosimeter with well-defined 3D sensitive volumes (SV). The dose equivalent downstream and laterally outside of a clinical PBS treatment field was assessed and compared to that of a DS beam. Methods: A novel silicon microdosimeter with well-defined 3D SVs was used in this study. It was connected to low noise electronics, allowing for detection of lineal energies as low as 0.15keV/m. The microdosimeter was placed at various depths in a water phantom along the central axis of the proton beam, and at the distal part of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in 0.5mm increments. The RBE values of the pristine Bragg peak (BP) and SOBP were derived using the measured microdosimetric lineal energy spectra as inputs to the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). Geant4 simulations were performed in order to verify the calculated depth-dose distribution from the treatment planning system (TPS) and to compare the simulated dose-mean lineal energy to the experimental results. Results: For a 131MeV PBS spot (124.6mm R-90 range in water), the measured dose-mean lineal energy (y(D)) over bar increased from 2 keV/mu m at the entrance to 8keV/m in the BP, with a maximum value of 10 keV/mu m at the distal edge. The derived RBE distribution for the PBS beam slowly increased from 0.970.14 at the entrance to 1.04 +/- 0.09 proximal to the BP, then to 1.1 +/- 0.08 in the BP, and steeply rose to 1.57 +/- 0.19 at the distal part of the BP. The RBE distribution for the DS SOBP beam was approximately 0.96 +/- 0.16 to 1.01 +/- 0.16 at shallow depths, and 1.01 +/- 0.16 to 1.28 +/- 0.17 within the SOBP. The RBE significantly increased from 1.29 +/- 0.17 to 1.43 +/- 0.18 at the distal edge of the SOBP. Conclusions: The SOI microdosimeter with its well-defined 3D SV has applicability in characterizing proton radiation fields and can measure relevant physical parameters to model the RBE with submillimeter spatial resolution. It has been shown that for a physical dose of 1.82Gy at the BP, the derived RBE based on the MKM model increased from 1.14 to 1.6 in the BP and its distal part. Good agreement was observed between the experimental and simulation results, confirming the potential application of SOI microdosimeter with 3D SV for quality assurance in proton therapy. (C) 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:6085 / 6095
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on the RBE estimation for carbon beam scanning irradiation using a solid-state microdosimeter
    Han, Soorim
    Yoo, Seung Hoon
    Shin, Jae Ik
    Kim, Eun Ho
    Jung, Won-Gyun
    Kim, Kum Bae
    Matsumura, Akihiko
    Kanai, Tatsuaki
    Tran, Linh T.
    Chartier, Lachlan
    James, Benjamin
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) : 363 - 370
  • [2] Proton FLASH: passive scattering or pencil beam scanning?
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Wang, Junliang
    Wang, Yuenan
    Peng, Hao
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (03):
  • [3] Proton Radiosurgery: A Clinical Transition From Passive Scattering to Pencil Beam Scanning
    Bussiere, M.
    Daartz, J.
    Verburg, J.
    Depauw, N.
    Kooy, H. M.
    Loeffler, J. S.
    Chapman, H.
    Shih, H. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E544 - E544
  • [4] Breast cancer irradiation using proton pencil beam scanning
    Pasztorova, A.
    Kubes, J.
    Andrlik, M.
    Ondrova, B.
    Kasacova, G.
    Dedeckova, K.
    Slavikova, S.
    Vitek, P.
    Vinakurau, S.
    Kvech, J.
    Vondracek, V.
    Navratil, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S699 - S700
  • [5] Characterization of passive dosimeters in proton pencil beam scanning ? A EURADOS intercomparison for mailed dosimetry audits in proton therapy centres
    -Hubert, M. De Saint
    Angelis, C. De
    Knezevic, Z.
    Michalec, B.
    Reniers, B.
    Pyszka, E.
    Stolarczyk, L.
    Swakon, J.
    Foltynska, G.
    Wochnik, A.
    Parisi, A.
    Majer, M.
    Harrison, R. M.
    Kopec, R.
    Vanhavere, F.
    Olko, P.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 82 : 134 - 143
  • [6] Commissioning the beam model of apertures in a compact proton system using pencil beam scanning
    Perez Moreno, J. M.
    Vera Sanchez, J. A.
    Cerron Campoo, F.
    Castro Novais, J.
    Canals de las Casas, E.
    Lorenzo Villanueva, I.
    Sallabanda Hajro, M.
    Montero Feijoo, M.
    de Pablo Gonzalez, A.
    Matute Martin, R.
    Miralbell, R.
    Mazal, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1750 - S1751
  • [7] Ultra-fast, high spatial resolution single-pulse scintillation imaging of synchrocyclotron pencil beam scanning proton delivery
    Clark, Megan
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Zhao, Lewei
    Pogue, Brian
    Gladstone, David
    Rahman, Mahbubur
    Zhang, Rongxiao
    Bruza, Petr
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04):
  • [8] Commissioning and beam characterization of the first gantry-mounted accelerator pencil beam scanning proton system
    Kang, M.
    Cessac, Rob
    Pang, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (08) : 3496 - 3510
  • [9] Biophysical characterization of collimated and uncollimated fields in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Nabha, Racell
    De Saint-Hubert, Marijke
    Marichal, Joachim
    Esser, Johannes
    Van Hoey, Olivier
    Baeumer, Christian
    Verbeek, Nico
    Struelens, Lara
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Tabury, Kevin
    Marek, Lukas
    Granja, Carlos
    Timmermann, Beate
    Vanhavere, Filip
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (06):
  • [10] Comparison of clinical outcomes between passive scattering versus pencil -beam scanning proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yoo, Gyu Sang
    Yu, Jeong Il
    Cho, Sungkoo
    Jung, Sang Hoon
    Han, Youngyih
    Park, Seyjoon
    Oh, Yoonjin
    Lee, Boram
    Park, Hee Chul
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Choi, Moon Seok
    Won, Hojeong
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 : 187 - 193