Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Gilbert, Sharon A. [1 ]
Grobman, William A. [2 ,3 ]
Landon, Mark B. [4 ]
Spong, Catherine Y. [16 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [5 ]
Leveno, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Varner, Michael W. [7 ]
Caritis, Steve N. [17 ]
Meis, Paul J. [8 ]
Sorokin, Yoram [9 ]
Carpenter, Marshall [10 ]
O'Sullivan, Mary J. [11 ]
Sibai, Baha M. [12 ]
Thorp, John M. [13 ]
Ramin, Susan M. [14 ]
Mercer, Brian M. [15 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[9] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[10] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[11] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[12] Univ Tennessee, Memphis, TN USA
[13] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[14] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
[15] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[16] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
elective repeat cesarean delivery; propensity score; trial of labor; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOMES; NUMBER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, after the use of propensity score techniques, to create balanced groups according to whether a woman undergoes elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL). STUDY DESIGN: Women who were eligible for a TOL with 1 previous low transverse incision were categorized according to whether they underwent an ERCD or TOL. A propensity score technique was used to develop ERCD and TOL groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The rates of endometritis, operative injury, respiratory distress syndrome, and newborn infant infection were lower and the rates of hysterectomy and wound complication were higher in the ERCD group. CONCLUSION: Propensity score techniques can be used to generate comparable ERCD and TOL groups. Some types of maternal morbidity (such as hysterectomy) are higher; other types (such as operative injury) are lower in the ERCD group. Although the absolute risk is low, neonatal morbidity appears to be lower in the ERCD group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Kok, N.
    Ruiter, L.
    Lindeboom, R.
    de Groot, C.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Mol, B. W.
    Kazemier, B. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 214 - 218
  • [2] Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Markovic, Emily S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e2582 - e2586
  • [3] Maternal Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Compared With Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Gold, Stacey L.
    Downs, Sarah
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [4] The MFMU cesarean registry: propensity score analysis for bias reduction in comparing elective repeat cesarean delivery with trial of labor after a previous cesarean
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S20 - S20
  • [5] Trial of labor versus elective cesarean delivery for patients with two prior cesarean-sections: A retrospective propensity score analysis
    Roux, Lea
    Chiemlewski, Marie-Charlotte
    Lassel, Linda
    Isly, Helene
    Enderle, Isabelle
    Beuchee, Alain
    Le Lous, Maela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 287 : 67 - 74
  • [6] Neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with elective cesarean
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Downs, Sarah G.
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    Mokhtari, Neggin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S380 - S380
  • [7] The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Mi, Mei-yan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (07) : E37156
  • [8] Outcomes of Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Abdelrahman, Safinaz
    Qamaruddin, Arjumand
    Khadeer, Sara
    Al-Jufairi, Zainab
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2022, 44 (04) : 1122 - 1128
  • [9] Low lying placenta: trial of labor or elective cesarean delivery, a propensity score analysis.
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Sentilhes, Loic
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S769 - S770
  • [10] Neonatal end organ damage with elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor with cesarean: analysis based on propensity scores
    Chauhan, Suneet
    Beydoun, Hind
    Hammad, Ibrahim
    Ananth, Cande
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S90 - S90