Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Gilbert, Sharon A. [1 ]
Grobman, William A. [2 ,3 ]
Landon, Mark B. [4 ]
Spong, Catherine Y. [16 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [5 ]
Leveno, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Varner, Michael W. [7 ]
Caritis, Steve N. [17 ]
Meis, Paul J. [8 ]
Sorokin, Yoram [9 ]
Carpenter, Marshall [10 ]
O'Sullivan, Mary J. [11 ]
Sibai, Baha M. [12 ]
Thorp, John M. [13 ]
Ramin, Susan M. [14 ]
Mercer, Brian M. [15 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[9] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[10] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[11] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[12] Univ Tennessee, Memphis, TN USA
[13] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[14] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
[15] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[16] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
elective repeat cesarean delivery; propensity score; trial of labor; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOMES; NUMBER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, after the use of propensity score techniques, to create balanced groups according to whether a woman undergoes elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL). STUDY DESIGN: Women who were eligible for a TOL with 1 previous low transverse incision were categorized according to whether they underwent an ERCD or TOL. A propensity score technique was used to develop ERCD and TOL groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The rates of endometritis, operative injury, respiratory distress syndrome, and newborn infant infection were lower and the rates of hysterectomy and wound complication were higher in the ERCD group. CONCLUSION: Propensity score techniques can be used to generate comparable ERCD and TOL groups. Some types of maternal morbidity (such as hysterectomy) are higher; other types (such as operative injury) are lower in the ERCD group. Although the absolute risk is low, neonatal morbidity appears to be lower in the ERCD group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery
    Fagerberg, Marie C.
    Marsal, Karel
    Kallen, Karin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1151 - 1158
  • [42] Trial of Labor Compared With Cesarean Delivery in Superobese Women
    Grasch, Jennifer L.
    Thompson, Jennifer L.
    Newton, Michael
    Zhai, Amy W.
    Osmundson, Sarah S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (05): : 994 - 1000
  • [43] Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in Ireland
    Lutomski, Jennifer
    Greene, Richard
    Meaney, Sarah
    Forgeard, Natalie
    Devane, Declan
    Daly, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S341 - S342
  • [44] Dinoprostone and Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery
    Leftwich, Heidi K.
    Peterson, Jessica
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 64S - 65S
  • [45] Breastfeeding rates in women that attempt trial of labor after cesarean vs. repeat cesarean delivery
    Guerrero, Kerly M.
    Parikh, Reshma
    Swirski, Eve
    Krishnamoorthy, Kaila
    Gittens, Lisa
    Apuzzio, Joseph J.
    Williams, Shauna F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S694 - S694
  • [46] Predictors of repeat cesarean delivery after trial of labor: Do any exist?
    Learman, LA
    Evertson, LR
    Shiboski, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1996, 182 (03) : 257 - 262
  • [47] Elective induction of labor versus expectant management after one prior cesarean delivery
    Ukoha, Erinma P.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    Wen, Timothy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S466 - S466
  • [48] FACTORS PREDICTING ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY
    HUESTON, WJ
    RUDY, M
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (05): : 741 - 744
  • [49] Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery According to Predicted Likelihood of Vaginal Delivery
    Downs, Sarah
    Mokhtari, Neggin
    Gold, Stacey
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (06) : 322 - 324
  • [50] Maternal and neonatal outcomes of trial of labor compared with elective cesarean delivery according to predicted likelihood of vaginal delivery
    Downs, Sarah
    Mokhtari, Neggin
    Gold, Stacey
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (26): : 10487 - 10493