Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Gilbert, Sharon A. [1 ]
Grobman, William A. [2 ,3 ]
Landon, Mark B. [4 ]
Spong, Catherine Y. [16 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [5 ]
Leveno, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Varner, Michael W. [7 ]
Caritis, Steve N. [17 ]
Meis, Paul J. [8 ]
Sorokin, Yoram [9 ]
Carpenter, Marshall [10 ]
O'Sullivan, Mary J. [11 ]
Sibai, Baha M. [12 ]
Thorp, John M. [13 ]
Ramin, Susan M. [14 ]
Mercer, Brian M. [15 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[9] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[10] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[11] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[12] Univ Tennessee, Memphis, TN USA
[13] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[14] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
[15] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[16] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
elective repeat cesarean delivery; propensity score; trial of labor; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOMES; NUMBER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, after the use of propensity score techniques, to create balanced groups according to whether a woman undergoes elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL). STUDY DESIGN: Women who were eligible for a TOL with 1 previous low transverse incision were categorized according to whether they underwent an ERCD or TOL. A propensity score technique was used to develop ERCD and TOL groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The rates of endometritis, operative injury, respiratory distress syndrome, and newborn infant infection were lower and the rates of hysterectomy and wound complication were higher in the ERCD group. CONCLUSION: Propensity score techniques can be used to generate comparable ERCD and TOL groups. Some types of maternal morbidity (such as hysterectomy) are higher; other types (such as operative injury) are lower in the ERCD group. Although the absolute risk is low, neonatal morbidity appears to be lower in the ERCD group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Ruiz, Vanessa
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Merviel, Philippe
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Jauniaux, Eric
    Sentilhes, Loic
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (03): : 429 - 438
  • [32] Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis
    Rossi, A. Cristina
    D'Addario, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) : 224 - 231
  • [33] An economic analysis of trial of labor after cesarean delivery
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Chen, Ling
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Wright, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (07): : 1030 - 1035
  • [34] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Vukcevic, G.
    Kljakic, D.
    Popivoda, Z.
    Grdinic, A.
    Marijanovic, G.
    Raicevic, S.
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 675 - +
  • [36] Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Abiad, May
    Grobman, William A.
    Mosesso, Kelly M.
    Daggy, Joanne K.
    Javinani, Ali
    Khalil, Asma
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Landon, Mark B.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (03): : 325 - 334
  • [37] Outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery - Reply
    Landon, MB
    Leindecker, S
    Spong, CY
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16): : 1720 - 1720
  • [38] Prior vaginal delivery in trial of labor after cesarean: Is there a dose response?
    Rimsza, Rebecca R.
    Perez, William M.
    Vricella, Laura K.
    Gross, Gilad A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S630 - S630
  • [39] Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review
    Rogers, Anna Joy
    Rogers, Nathaniel G.
    Kilgore, Meredith L.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Harper, Lorie M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [40] Trial of labor versus elective cesarean delivery for patients with two prior cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mao, Hui
    Shen, Pinghua
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01):