Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta

被引:1
|
作者
Froeliger, Alizee
Madar, Hugo
Jeanneteau, Pauline
Ruiz, Vanessa
Le Lous, Maela
Perrotin, Franck
Winer, Norbert
Dreyfus, Michel
Merviel, Philippe
Mattuizzi, Aurelien
Jauniaux, Eric
Sentilhes, Loic
机构
[1] Bordeaux Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Obstet, Bordeaux, France
[2] Bordeaux Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Bordeaux, France
[3] Angers Univ Hosp Ctr, Angers, France
[4] Rennes Univ Hosp Ctr, Rennes, France
[5] Tours Univ Hosp Ctr, Tours, France
[6] Nantes Univ Hosp Ctr, Nantes, France
[7] Caen Univ Hosp Ctr, Caen, France
[8] Brest Univ Hosp Ctr, Brest, France
[9] UCL, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, Fac Populat Hlth Sci, London, England
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 03期
关键词
INTERNAL OS DISTANCE; BLOOD-LOSS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; PROPENSITY SCORE; TRANEXAMIC ACID; FRENCH COLLEGE; EDGE; GYNECOLOGISTS; OBSTETRICIANS;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004890
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of women with low-lying placenta by planned mode of delivery and distance from the internal os distance. METHODS: Six tertiary maternity hospitals in France participated in this retrospective multicenter study of births from 2007-2012. Women with low-lying placenta, defined as an internal os distance of 20 mm or less, who gave birth after 35 weeks of gestation were included and classified in the planned trial-of-labor or elective cesarean delivery groups. The primary endpoint was severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) defined as blood loss exceeding 1,000 mL. Secondary outcomes were composite variables of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity scores to compare outcomes by planned mode of delivery. RESULTS: Among 128,233 births during the study period, 171 (0.13%) women had low-lying placenta: 70 (40.9%) in the trial-of-labor group and 101 (59.1%) who underwent elective cesarean delivery. The rate of severe PPH was 22.9% (16/70, 95% CI 13.7-34.4) for the trial-of-labor group and 23.0% (23/101, 95% CI 15.2-32.5) for the cesarean delivery group (P=.9); severe maternal and neonatal morbidity rates were likewise similar (2.9% vs 2.0% [P=.7] and 12.9% vs 9.9% [P=.5], respectively). Trial-of-labor was not significantly associated with a higher rate of severe PPH after multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-weighted analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.62-3.24 [P=.4]; and aOR 1.34, 95% CI 0.53-3.38 [P=.5], respectively). The vaginal delivery rate in the trial-of-labor group was 50.0% (19/38) in those with an internal os distance of 11-20 mm and 18.5% (5/27) in those with a distance of 1-10 mm. CONCLUSION: Our results support a policy of offering a trial of labor to women with low-lying placenta after 35 weeks of gestation and an internal os distance of 11-20 mm. An internal os distance of 1-10 mm reduces the likelihood of vaginal birth considerably, compared with 11-20 mm, but without increasing the incidence of severe PPH or severe maternal morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 438
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low lying placenta: trial of labor or elective cesarean delivery, a propensity score analysis.
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Sentilhes, Loic
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S769 - S770
  • [2] Planned vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean delivery in cases of low-lying placenta
    Taga, Atsuko
    Sato, Yukiyasu
    Sakae, Chieko
    Satake, Yumiko
    Emoto, Ikuko
    Maruyama, Shunsuke
    Mise, Hiroko
    Kim, Tomoko
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (05): : 618 - 622
  • [3] Neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with elective cesarean
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Downs, Sarah G.
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    Mokhtari, Neggin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S380 - S380
  • [4] Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Markovic, Emily S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e2582 - e2586
  • [5] Maternal Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Compared With Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Gold, Stacey L.
    Downs, Sarah
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [6] Effect of a low-lying placenta on delivery outcome
    Bronsteen, R.
    Valice, R.
    Lee, W.
    Blackwell, S.
    Balasubramaniam, M.
    Comstock, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 33 (02) : 204 - 208
  • [7] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Kok, N.
    Ruiter, L.
    Lindeboom, R.
    de Groot, C.
    Pajkrt, E.
    Mol, B. W.
    Kazemier, B. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 214 - 218
  • [8] LOW-LYING PLACENTA
    PEARSON, AC
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1954, 2 (4896): : 1104 - 1104
  • [9] LOW-LYING PLACENTA
    GILLIESON, MS
    WINERMURAM, HT
    MURAM, D
    RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (03) : 577 - 580
  • [10] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    Grobman, William A.
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Meis, Paul J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04)