Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta

被引:1
|
作者
Froeliger, Alizee
Madar, Hugo
Jeanneteau, Pauline
Ruiz, Vanessa
Le Lous, Maela
Perrotin, Franck
Winer, Norbert
Dreyfus, Michel
Merviel, Philippe
Mattuizzi, Aurelien
Jauniaux, Eric
Sentilhes, Loic
机构
[1] Bordeaux Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Obstet, Bordeaux, France
[2] Bordeaux Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Bordeaux, France
[3] Angers Univ Hosp Ctr, Angers, France
[4] Rennes Univ Hosp Ctr, Rennes, France
[5] Tours Univ Hosp Ctr, Tours, France
[6] Nantes Univ Hosp Ctr, Nantes, France
[7] Caen Univ Hosp Ctr, Caen, France
[8] Brest Univ Hosp Ctr, Brest, France
[9] UCL, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, Fac Populat Hlth Sci, London, England
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 03期
关键词
INTERNAL OS DISTANCE; BLOOD-LOSS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; PROPENSITY SCORE; TRANEXAMIC ACID; FRENCH COLLEGE; EDGE; GYNECOLOGISTS; OBSTETRICIANS;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004890
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of women with low-lying placenta by planned mode of delivery and distance from the internal os distance. METHODS: Six tertiary maternity hospitals in France participated in this retrospective multicenter study of births from 2007-2012. Women with low-lying placenta, defined as an internal os distance of 20 mm or less, who gave birth after 35 weeks of gestation were included and classified in the planned trial-of-labor or elective cesarean delivery groups. The primary endpoint was severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) defined as blood loss exceeding 1,000 mL. Secondary outcomes were composite variables of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity scores to compare outcomes by planned mode of delivery. RESULTS: Among 128,233 births during the study period, 171 (0.13%) women had low-lying placenta: 70 (40.9%) in the trial-of-labor group and 101 (59.1%) who underwent elective cesarean delivery. The rate of severe PPH was 22.9% (16/70, 95% CI 13.7-34.4) for the trial-of-labor group and 23.0% (23/101, 95% CI 15.2-32.5) for the cesarean delivery group (P=.9); severe maternal and neonatal morbidity rates were likewise similar (2.9% vs 2.0% [P=.7] and 12.9% vs 9.9% [P=.5], respectively). Trial-of-labor was not significantly associated with a higher rate of severe PPH after multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-weighted analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.62-3.24 [P=.4]; and aOR 1.34, 95% CI 0.53-3.38 [P=.5], respectively). The vaginal delivery rate in the trial-of-labor group was 50.0% (19/38) in those with an internal os distance of 11-20 mm and 18.5% (5/27) in those with a distance of 1-10 mm. CONCLUSION: Our results support a policy of offering a trial of labor to women with low-lying placenta after 35 weeks of gestation and an internal os distance of 11-20 mm. An internal os distance of 1-10 mm reduces the likelihood of vaginal birth considerably, compared with 11-20 mm, but without increasing the incidence of severe PPH or severe maternal morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 438
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is Elective Cesarean Delivery for Elderly Primiparas Safer Than Trial of Labor?
    Yahya, Rani Haj
    Lipschuetz, Michal
    Safrai, Myriam
    Yagel, Simcha
    Kabiri, Doron
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2018, 25 : 264A - 264A
  • [22] Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Gama, Silvana G. N.
    Leal, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 (03) : 351 - 359
  • [23] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MODE OF DELIVERY AND PERINATAL OUTCOME IN CASES WITH LOW-LYING PLACENTA
    Kanda, Masako
    Hayashi, Shusaku
    Haino, Kazufumi
    Ishii, Keisuke
    Mitsuda, Nbuaki
    PLACENTA, 2016, 46 : 114 - 115
  • [24] Bleeding complications in pregnancies with low-lying placenta
    Wortman, Alison C.
    Twickler, Diane M.
    McIntire, Donald D.
    Dashe, Jodi S.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (09): : 1367 - 1371
  • [25] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section
    Fisler, RE
    Cohen, A
    Ringer, SA
    Lieberman, E
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2003, 30 (02): : 83 - 88
  • [26] The MFMU Cesarean Registry: cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor compared with an elective repeat cesarean delivery after a previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S303 - S303
  • [27] Vaginal delivery in women with a low-lying placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jansen, C. H. J. R.
    de Mooij, Y. M.
    Blomaard, C. M.
    Derks, J. B.
    van Leeuwen, E.
    Limpens, J.
    Schuit, E.
    Mol, B. W.
    Pajkrt, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1118 - 1126
  • [28] ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY VERSUS TRIAL OF LABOR - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY
    FLAMM, BL
    GOINGS, JR
    LIU, YB
    WOLDETSADIK, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06): : 927 - 932
  • [29] The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Mi, Mei-yan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (07) : E37156
  • [30] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery
    Fagerberg, Marie C.
    Marsal, Karel
    Kallen, Karin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1151 - 1158