Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kok, N. [1 ]
Ruiter, L. [2 ]
Lindeboom, R. [3 ]
de Groot, C. [1 ]
Pajkrt, E. [2 ]
Mol, B. W. [4 ]
Kazemier, B. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1081 HZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD); Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC); Trial of labor (TOL); Propensity score matching; Adverse neonatal outcomes; SECTION; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine neonatal and short term maternal outcomes according to intentional mode of delivery following a cesarean delivery (CD). Study design: Women pregnant after CD between January 2000 and December 2007 were categorized according to whether they had an elective repeat CD (ERCD) or a Trial of Labor (TOL). Prognostically equal ERCD and TOL groups were created using the propensity score matching technique. Conditional logistic regression was performed to assess differences in neonatal and maternal outcomes. Population: Women in their second ongoing pregnancy with a history of CD. Results: After ERCD the rates of low 5 min Apgar score (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.2-0.5, p < 0.001), meconium aspiration (OR 0.0, 95%CI 0-0.7, p = 0.02) and birth trauma (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.002-0.5, p < 0.001) were lower compared to TOL. The rate of transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) appears higher in the ERCD group (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.8, p = 0.04). Uterine rupture (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0.003-0.8, p = 0.02) and hemorrhage (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5-0.8, p < 0.001) occurred less in the ERCD group. Conclusion: Neonatal and short term maternal morbidity appears to be lower after ERCD than after TOL. Only UN was seen more often after ERCD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 218
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    Grobman, William A.
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Meis, Paul J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04)
  • [2] Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Markovic, Emily S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e2582 - e2586
  • [3] Maternal Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Compared With Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Gold, Stacey L.
    Downs, Sarah
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [4] The MFMU cesarean registry: propensity score analysis for bias reduction in comparing elective repeat cesarean delivery with trial of labor after a previous cesarean
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S20 - S20
  • [5] Trial of labor versus elective cesarean delivery for patients with two prior cesarean-sections: A retrospective propensity score analysis
    Roux, Lea
    Chiemlewski, Marie-Charlotte
    Lassel, Linda
    Isly, Helene
    Enderle, Isabelle
    Beuchee, Alain
    Le Lous, Maela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 287 : 67 - 74
  • [6] Neonatal outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean delivery compared with elective cesarean
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Downs, Sarah G.
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    Mokhtari, Neggin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S380 - S380
  • [7] The impact of a trial of labor after cesarean versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Xiao
    Mi, Mei-yan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (07) : E37156
  • [8] Outcomes of Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Abdelrahman, Safinaz
    Qamaruddin, Arjumand
    Khadeer, Sara
    Al-Jufairi, Zainab
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2022, 44 (04) : 1122 - 1128
  • [9] Low lying placenta: trial of labor or elective cesarean delivery, a propensity score analysis.
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Sentilhes, Loic
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S769 - S770
  • [10] Neonatal end organ damage with elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor with cesarean: analysis based on propensity scores
    Chauhan, Suneet
    Beydoun, Hind
    Hammad, Ibrahim
    Ananth, Cande
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S90 - S90