Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kok, N. [1 ]
Ruiter, L. [2 ]
Lindeboom, R. [3 ]
de Groot, C. [1 ]
Pajkrt, E. [2 ]
Mol, B. W. [4 ]
Kazemier, B. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1081 HZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Adelaide, Robinson Res Inst, Sch Paediat & Reprod Hlth, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD); Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC); Trial of labor (TOL); Propensity score matching; Adverse neonatal outcomes; SECTION; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine neonatal and short term maternal outcomes according to intentional mode of delivery following a cesarean delivery (CD). Study design: Women pregnant after CD between January 2000 and December 2007 were categorized according to whether they had an elective repeat CD (ERCD) or a Trial of Labor (TOL). Prognostically equal ERCD and TOL groups were created using the propensity score matching technique. Conditional logistic regression was performed to assess differences in neonatal and maternal outcomes. Population: Women in their second ongoing pregnancy with a history of CD. Results: After ERCD the rates of low 5 min Apgar score (OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.2-0.5, p < 0.001), meconium aspiration (OR 0.0, 95%CI 0-0.7, p = 0.02) and birth trauma (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.002-0.5, p < 0.001) were lower compared to TOL. The rate of transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN) appears higher in the ERCD group (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.0-2.8, p = 0.04). Uterine rupture (OR 0.1, 95%CI 0.003-0.8, p = 0.02) and hemorrhage (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5-0.8, p < 0.001) occurred less in the ERCD group. Conclusion: Neonatal and short term maternal morbidity appears to be lower after ERCD than after TOL. Only UN was seen more often after ERCD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 218
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trial of Labor Compared With Elective Cesarean Delivery for Low-Lying Placenta
    Froeliger, Alizee
    Madar, Hugo
    Jeanneteau, Pauline
    Ruiz, Vanessa
    Le Lous, Maela
    Perrotin, Franck
    Winer, Norbert
    Dreyfus, Michel
    Merviel, Philippe
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Jauniaux, Eric
    Sentilhes, Loic
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (03): : 429 - 438
  • [32] Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis
    Rossi, A. Cristina
    D'Addario, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) : 224 - 231
  • [33] An economic analysis of trial of labor after cesarean delivery
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Chen, Ling
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Wright, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (07): : 1030 - 1035
  • [34] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Vukcevic, G.
    Kljakic, D.
    Popivoda, Z.
    Grdinic, A.
    Marijanovic, G.
    Raicevic, S.
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 675 - +
  • [36] Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Abiad, May
    Grobman, William A.
    Mosesso, Kelly M.
    Daggy, Joanne K.
    Javinani, Ali
    Khalil, Asma
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Landon, Mark B.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (03): : 325 - 334
  • [37] Outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery - Reply
    Landon, MB
    Leindecker, S
    Spong, CY
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16): : 1720 - 1720
  • [38] Prior vaginal delivery in trial of labor after cesarean: Is there a dose response?
    Rimsza, Rebecca R.
    Perez, William M.
    Vricella, Laura K.
    Gross, Gilad A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S630 - S630
  • [39] Economic Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review
    Rogers, Anna Joy
    Rogers, Nathaniel G.
    Kilgore, Meredith L.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Harper, Lorie M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 163 - 173
  • [40] Trial of labor versus elective cesarean delivery for patients with two prior cesarean sections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mao, Hui
    Shen, Pinghua
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01):