Outcomes of Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery

被引:0
|
作者
Abdelrahman, Safinaz [1 ]
Qamaruddin, Arjumand [1 ]
Khadeer, Sara [1 ]
Al-Jufairi, Zainab [2 ]
机构
[1] Salmaniya Med Complex SMC, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Salmaniya Med Complex SMC, Obstet & Gynecol, Manama, Bahrain
关键词
TOLAC; VBAC; ERCS; Previous cesarean section; VAGINAL BIRTH; UTERINE RUPTURE; RISK; MORBIDITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of trial of labor (TOLAC) versus elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCS) in women with a previous caesarean delivery in our institution. Methods: All women with a singleton gestation and a prior cesarean delivery in maternity department at Salmaniya medical complex, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain during the period between June 2017 to July 2018 have been included. Baseline characteristics as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes between women who underwent TOLAC versus ERCS were compared in retrospective descriptive and comparative study Results: This study included 586 women, two thirds (n=347, 59.2%) underwent trial for normal delivery during which more than half succeeded (n=199, 57.3%) and the rest went for emergency cesarean section (n=148, 42.7%). The second group preferred elective cesarean section (n=239, 40.8%). Women in both groups TOLAC and ERCS are very comparable in term of age which was nearly identical on average (31 years vs. 31.2 years). Those in TOLAC arm had significantly higher number of previous normal vaginal delivery compared to ERCS arm (167, 48.1%) vs. (49, 20.5%), p<0.0001). The proportion of diabetes mellitus patients was 2.3 times higher in the elective cesarean section group than those who underwent trial of labor (4.6% vs. 2%). Also, the proportion of subjects with hypertension was 3.3 times higher in the ERCS group than the TOLAC group with a statistically significant difference (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p=0.046). The two groups were compared against various maternal and fetal outcomes and turned to be quite similar except for the total blood loss and ultimately the need for blood transfusion which was associated more with ERCS. Conclusion: In our population, after first cesarean delivery; diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension appears as a potent driven factors for ELCS while the major driven factor for TOLAC is previous normal delivery with overall moderate success rate. No major differences in maternal and fetal outcomes but risk of bleeding is more in ELCS.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1128
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Landon, Mark B.
    Hauth, John C.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (01): : 125 - 133
  • [2] Maternal Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery Compared With Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Gold, Stacey L.
    Downs, Sarah
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Ghofranian, Atoosa
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [3] Trial of Labor versus Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Individuals with Morbid Obesity after Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Lee, Misooja
    Almeida, Tawany C.
    Saade, George
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 (14) : 1980 - 1989
  • [4] Morbidity of Repeat Cesarean Delivery after a Trial of Labor as Compared with Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Markovic, Emily S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e2582 - e2586
  • [5] Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Gama, Silvana G. N.
    Leal, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 (03) : 351 - 359
  • [6] Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bryant, Allison S.
    Norrell, Laura
    Bermingham, Yamilee
    Altshuler, Anna
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Moghadassi, Michelle
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (08) : 1143 - 1152
  • [7] Women's preferences regarding the processes and outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean and elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bryant, Allison
    Norrell, Laura
    Bermingham, Yamilee
    Atshuler, Anna
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Moghadassi, Michelle
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S516 - S516
  • [8] Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: A decision analysis
    Chuang, JH
    Jenders, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, : 226 - 230
  • [9] Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies after a previous cesarean delivery-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shinar, Shiri
    Agrawal, Swati
    Hasan, Haroon
    Berger, Howard
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2019, 46 (04): : 550 - 559
  • [10] ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY VERSUS TRIAL OF LABOR - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY
    FLAMM, BL
    GOINGS, JR
    LIU, YB
    WOLDETSADIK, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06): : 927 - 932