Outcomes of Trial of Labor versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery in Women with a Previous Cesarean Delivery

被引:0
|
作者
Abdelrahman, Safinaz [1 ]
Qamaruddin, Arjumand [1 ]
Khadeer, Sara [1 ]
Al-Jufairi, Zainab [2 ]
机构
[1] Salmaniya Med Complex SMC, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Manama, Bahrain
[2] Salmaniya Med Complex SMC, Obstet & Gynecol, Manama, Bahrain
关键词
TOLAC; VBAC; ERCS; Previous cesarean section; VAGINAL BIRTH; UTERINE RUPTURE; RISK; MORBIDITY; SUCCESS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the maternal and fetal outcomes of trial of labor (TOLAC) versus elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCS) in women with a previous caesarean delivery in our institution. Methods: All women with a singleton gestation and a prior cesarean delivery in maternity department at Salmaniya medical complex, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain during the period between June 2017 to July 2018 have been included. Baseline characteristics as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes between women who underwent TOLAC versus ERCS were compared in retrospective descriptive and comparative study Results: This study included 586 women, two thirds (n=347, 59.2%) underwent trial for normal delivery during which more than half succeeded (n=199, 57.3%) and the rest went for emergency cesarean section (n=148, 42.7%). The second group preferred elective cesarean section (n=239, 40.8%). Women in both groups TOLAC and ERCS are very comparable in term of age which was nearly identical on average (31 years vs. 31.2 years). Those in TOLAC arm had significantly higher number of previous normal vaginal delivery compared to ERCS arm (167, 48.1%) vs. (49, 20.5%), p<0.0001). The proportion of diabetes mellitus patients was 2.3 times higher in the elective cesarean section group than those who underwent trial of labor (4.6% vs. 2%). Also, the proportion of subjects with hypertension was 3.3 times higher in the ERCS group than the TOLAC group with a statistically significant difference (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p=0.046). The two groups were compared against various maternal and fetal outcomes and turned to be quite similar except for the total blood loss and ultimately the need for blood transfusion which was associated more with ERCS. Conclusion: In our population, after first cesarean delivery; diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension appears as a potent driven factors for ELCS while the major driven factor for TOLAC is previous normal delivery with overall moderate success rate. No major differences in maternal and fetal outcomes but risk of bleeding is more in ELCS.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1128
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREVIOUS CESAREAN DELIVERY AND TRIAL OF LABOR - REPLY
    FINLEY, BE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (04) : 1015 - 1015
  • [22] Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    Grobman, William A.
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Meis, Paul J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04)
  • [23] Maternal and neonatal morbidity: repeat Cesarean versus a trial of labour after previous Cesarean delivery
    Yang, Yue-Zhou
    Ye, Xu-Ping
    Sun, Xiao-Xi
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (03): : E135 - E145
  • [24] The MFMU Cesarean Registry: cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor compared with an elective repeat cesarean delivery after a previous cesarean in a minimally biased cohort
    Gilbert, Sharon A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S303 - S303
  • [25] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery
    Fagerberg, Marie C.
    Marsal, Karel
    Kallen, Karin
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (10) : 1151 - 1158
  • [26] The MFMU cesarean registry: Impact of morbid obesity on trial of labor vs elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Hibbard, JU
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S69 - S69
  • [27] Neonatal end organ damage with elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor with cesarean: analysis based on propensity scores
    Chauhan, Suneet
    Beydoun, Hind
    Hammad, Ibrahim
    Ananth, Cande
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S90 - S90
  • [28] Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Vukcevic, G.
    Kljakic, D.
    Popivoda, Z.
    Grdinic, A.
    Marijanovic, G.
    Raicevic, S.
    ADVANCES IN PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2010, : 675 - +
  • [29] Attempted operative vaginal delivery versus repeat cesarean in the second stage in women undergoing a trial of labor after cesarean
    Son, Moeun
    Roy, Archana
    Grobman, William A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S68 - S69
  • [30] Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery
    Beucher, G.
    Dolley, P.
    Levy-Thissier, S.
    Florian, A.
    Dreyfus, M.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2012, 41 (08): : 708 - 726