Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis

被引:35
|
作者
Gilbert, Sharon A. [1 ]
Grobman, William A. [2 ,3 ]
Landon, Mark B. [4 ]
Spong, Catherine Y. [16 ]
Rouse, Dwight J. [5 ]
Leveno, Kenneth J. [6 ]
Varner, Michael W. [7 ]
Caritis, Steve N. [17 ]
Meis, Paul J. [8 ]
Sorokin, Yoram [9 ]
Carpenter, Marshall [10 ]
O'Sullivan, Mary J. [11 ]
Sibai, Baha M. [12 ]
Thorp, John M. [13 ]
Ramin, Susan M. [14 ]
Mercer, Brian M. [15 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Ctr Biostat, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Obstet, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[8] Wake Forest Univ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[9] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[10] Brown Univ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[11] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[12] Univ Tennessee, Memphis, TN USA
[13] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[14] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX USA
[15] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[16] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Bethesda, MD USA
[17] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
elective repeat cesarean delivery; propensity score; trial of labor; UTERINE RUPTURE; VAGINAL BIRTH; OUTCOMES; NUMBER; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine outcomes, after the use of propensity score techniques, to create balanced groups according to whether a woman undergoes elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) or trial of labor (TOL). STUDY DESIGN: Women who were eligible for a TOL with 1 previous low transverse incision were categorized according to whether they underwent an ERCD or TOL. A propensity score technique was used to develop ERCD and TOL groups with comparable baseline characteristics. Outcomes were assessed with conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The rates of endometritis, operative injury, respiratory distress syndrome, and newborn infant infection were lower and the rates of hysterectomy and wound complication were higher in the ERCD group. CONCLUSION: Propensity score techniques can be used to generate comparable ERCD and TOL groups. Some types of maternal morbidity (such as hysterectomy) are higher; other types (such as operative injury) are lower in the ERCD group. Although the absolute risk is low, neonatal morbidity appears to be lower in the ERCD group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Elective induction of labor following prior cesarean delivery
    Saucedo, Alexander M.
    Macones, George A.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S421 - S422
  • [22] Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery
    Hibbard, Judith U.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Landon, Mark B.
    Hauth, John C.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (01): : 125 - 133
  • [23] The MFMU cesarean registry: Impact of morbid obesity on trial of labor vs elective repeat cesarean delivery
    Hibbard, JU
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S69 - S69
  • [24] Operative vaginal delivery compared with cesarean delivery for arrest or protraction in second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis
    Springel, Edward H.
    Berggren, Erica K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S282 - S282
  • [25] Outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery
    Kaplan, DL
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (16): : 1718 - 1719
  • [26] ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY VERSUS TRIAL OF LABOR - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY
    FLAMM, BL
    GOINGS, JR
    LIU, YB
    WOLDETSADIK, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06): : 927 - 932
  • [27] Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?
    Cahill, Alison G.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ratcliffe, Sarah J.
    Stevens, Erika J.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Macones, George A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (04) : 1143 - 1147
  • [28] Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in woman with a prior vaginal delivery?
    Cahill, A
    Stamilio, DM
    Odibo, AO
    Peipert, J
    Stevens, EJ
    Macones, GA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S123 - S123
  • [30] Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section
    Fisler, RE
    Cohen, A
    Ringer, SA
    Lieberman, E
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2003, 30 (02): : 83 - 88