Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
|
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Marianna Papadopoulou
    Sophia Stasi
    Daphne Bakalidou
    Effie Papageorgiou
    Aristi Tsokani
    Theodora Bratsi
    George Papathanasiou
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2020, 32 : 801 - 819
  • [42] Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis
    Kutlay, Sehim
    Kucukdeveci, Ayse A.
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Oztuna, Derya
    Koc, Nihal
    Tennant, Alan
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [43] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [44] Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases
    Olatz Garin
    Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos
    Josué Almansa
    Marta Nieto
    Somnath Chatterji
    Gemma Vilagut
    Jordi Alonso
    Alarcos Cieza
    Olga Svetskova
    Helena Burger
    Vittorio Racca
    Carlo Francescutti
    Eduard Vieta
    Nenad Kostanjsek
    Alberto Raggi
    Matilde Leonardi
    Montse Ferrer
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8
  • [45] Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis
    Şehim Kutlay
    Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci
    Atilla H. Elhan
    Derya Öztuna
    Nihal Koç
    Alan Tennant
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31 : 339 - 346
  • [46] Validation of the Polish version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in an elderly population (60-70 yearsold)
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Sozanski, Bernard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2018, 24 (03) : 386 - 394
  • [47] The Sociodemographic Factors Related to Disability of Applicants of Welfare Benefits in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey Based on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [48] Disability in bipolar I disorder: The 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Guilera, Georgina
    Gomez-Benito, Juana
    Pino, Oscar
    Rojo, Emilio
    Vieta, Eduard
    Cuesta, Manuel J.
    Purdon, Scot E.
    Bernardo, Miguel
    Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
    Franco, Manuel
    Martinez-Aran, Anabel
    Safont, Gemma
    Tabares-Seisdedos, Rafael
    Rejas, Javier
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2015, 174 : 353 - 360
  • [49] Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 to assess disability in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder
    Bovin, Michelle J.
    Meyer, Eric C.
    Kimbrel, Nathan A.
    Kleiman, Sarah E.
    Green, Jonathan D.
    Morissette, Sandra B.
    Marx, Brian P.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (08):
  • [50] The use of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population: the importance of functional assessment in the context of opioid risk evaluations
    Weed, V.
    Finkelman, M.
    Wawrzyniak, K.
    Kulich, R.
    Myrta, E.
    DiBenedetto, D.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (04): : S24 - S24