Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
|
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls
    Kunt, Duygu Aslan
    Dereboy, Ferhan
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2018, 29 (04) : 147 - 155
  • [22] Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal
    Risal, Ajay
    Kunwar, Dipak
    Karki, Eliza
    Adhikari, Shambhu Prasad
    Bimali, Inosha
    Shrestha, Barsha
    Khadka, Subekshya
    Holen, Are
    BMC PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [23] Adapting World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Nepal
    Ajay Risal
    Dipak Kunwar
    Eliza Karki
    Shambhu Prasad Adhikari
    Inosha Bimali
    Barsha Shrestha
    Subekshya Khadka
    Are Holen
    BMC Psychology, 9
  • [24] World health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 as an objective assessment tool for predicting return to work after a stroke
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (21) : 2592 - 2597
  • [25] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke
    Hu, Hsiang-Yueh
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (06) : 856 - 862
  • [26] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39
  • [27] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [28] Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis
    Karsikas, Mika
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Juhola, Juhani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (04) : 276 - 281
  • [29] Diabetes and disability - a latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Seet, V.
    Abdin, E.
    Jeyagurunathan, A.
    Tan, S. C.
    Lee, E. S.
    Vaingankar, J.
    Chong, S. A.
    Subramaniam, M.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 197
  • [30] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971