Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
|
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke
    Kucukdeveci, Ayse A.
    Kutlay, Sehim
    Yildizlar, Derya
    Oztuna, Derya
    Elhan, Atilla H.
    Tennant, Alan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 35 (03) : 214 - 220
  • [12] Functioning and disability of premenopausal women with urinary incontinence: An assessment by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-WHODAS 2.0
    de Macedo Dantas, Thaissa Hamana
    Castaneda, Luciana
    Correia, Grasiela Nascimento
    das Chagas Campelo, Clarissa Loureiro
    Dantas, Diego de Sousa
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2019, 38 (06) : 1767 - 1774
  • [13] Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) into Portuguese
    Silveira, Carla
    Parpinelli, Mary Angela
    Pacagnella, Rodolfo Carvalho
    de Camargo, Rodrigo Soares
    Costa, Maria Laura
    Zanardi, Dulce Maria
    Ferreira, Elton Carlos
    Santos, Juliana Paula
    Hanson, Lesley
    Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
    Andreucci, Carla Betina
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 59 (03): : 234 - 240
  • [14] Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia
    Gspandl, Scott
    Peirson, Ryan P.
    Nahhas, Ramzi W.
    Skale, Tracey Goodman
    Lehrer, Douglas S.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2018, 259 : 251 - 253
  • [15] Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Hu, Chaur-Jong
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (47) : e2155
  • [16] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review
    Ciamarra, Paola
    Corbi, Graziamaria
    Gimigliano, Francesca
    Feola, Alessandro
    Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [17] Clinimetrics: World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Paton, Michelle
    Lane, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2020, 66 (03) : 199 - 199
  • [18] VALIDATION OF THE "WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE, WHODAS-II"
    Garin, O.
    Nieto-Moreno, M.
    Almansa, J.
    Vilagut, G.
    Villalonga-Olives, E.
    Alonso, J.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Ayuso, J. L.
    Ferrer, M.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 : 53 - 54
  • [19] Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Uestuen, T. Bedirhan
    Chatterji, Somnath
    Kostanjsek, Nenad
    Rehm, Juergen
    Kennedy, Cille
    Epping-Jordan, Joanne
    Saxena, Shekhar
    von Korff, Michael
    Pull, Charles
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (11) : 815 - 823
  • [20] Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents
    de la Pena, Francisco R.
    Escalona, Mariana Paulina
    Ulloa, Rosa Elena
    Palacios-Cruz, Lino
    Palacio, Juan David
    Mayer, Pablo
    Diaz, Ricardo
    Rosetti, Marcos Francisco
    SALUD MENTAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 137 - 143