Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
|
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule for Children, WHODAS-Child" in Rwanda
    Scorza, Pamela
    Stevenson, Anne
    Canino, Glorisa
    Mushashi, Christine
    Kanyanganzi, Fredrick
    Munyanah, Morris
    Betancourt, Theresa
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [32] International Literature Review on WHODAS II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II)
    Federici, Stefano
    Meloni, Fabio
    Lo Presti, Alessandra
    LIFE SPAN AND DISABILITY, 2009, 12 (01) : 85 - 112
  • [33] THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (WHODAS 2.0) AND THE WHO MINIMAL GENERIC SET OF DOMAINS OF FUNCTIONING AND HEALTH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTS IN SUBACUTE STROKE
    Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka
    Hurme, Saija
    Laimi, Katri
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (09) : 675 - 682
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) questionnaire for women with urinary incontinence
    Ribeiro de Moura, Anna Caroline
    Rocha, Rebeca de Oliveira
    da Silva de Araujo, Ana Karoline
    de Castro, Shamyr Sulyvan
    Moreira, Mayle Andrade
    do Nascimento, Simony Lira
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (26) : 6455 - 6460
  • [35] Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 among adults with heart failure
    Gondim, Georgia de Melo Castro
    Bede, Julia Maria Sales
    Martins, Cristiany Azevedo
    da Silva, Francisco Vandecir
    da Silveira, Brenno Lucas Rodrigues
    Ribeiro, Vitoria Fonteles
    da Saude, Scheidt Martins
    Neto, Almino Cavalcante Rocha
    Mesquita, Rafael
    Mont'Alverne, Daniela Gardano Bucharles
    HEART & LUNG, 2025, 70 : 30 - 35
  • [36] World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review
    Federici, Stefano
    Bracalenti, Marco
    Meloni, Fabio
    Luciano, Juan V.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (23) : 2347 - 2380
  • [37] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a chronic pain population being considered for chronic opioid therapy
    Wawrzyniak, Kelly M.
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Schatman, Michael E.
    Kulich, Ronald J.
    Weed, Valerie F.
    Myrta, Eura
    DiBenedetto, David J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1855 - 1862
  • [38] Accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) score as an objective assessment tool for predicting return-to-work status after head and neck cancer in male survivors
    Yu-Hao Lee
    Kwang-Hwa Chang
    Reuben Escorpizo
    Wen-Chou Chi
    Chia-Feng Yen
    Hua-Fang Liao
    Shih-Wei Huang
    Tsan-Hon Liou
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 433 - 441
  • [39] Correlation between World Health Disability Assessment Schedule (Whodas) 2.0 and six minutes walk test
    Carvalho da Silva, Marcela Maria
    Lozano, Rafaela Sakumotu
    Pereira, Natalia Duarte
    Marrara Marmorato, Kamilla Tays
    De Souza, Nathalia Maria
    Barbosa Zorrer Franco, Francisco Jose
    Vergamini, Gabriela Carreri
    Arcuri, Juliano Ferreira
    Pires Di Lorenzo, Valeria Amorim
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [40] Accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) score as an objective assessment tool for predicting return-to-work status after head and neck cancer in male survivors
    Lee, Yu-Hao
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (02) : 433 - 441