Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Marianna Papadopoulou
Sophia Stasi
Daphne Bakalidou
Effie Papageorgiou
Aristi Tsokani
Theodora Bratsi
George Papathanasiou
机构
[1] University of West Attica,Laboratory of Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Study of Motion, Physiotherapy Department
[2] University of West Attica,Department of Biomedical Sciences
[3] University of West Attica,Department of Physical Therapy
关键词
Motor disability; 12 item-WHODAS 2.0; Psychometric properties; International classification of functioning; Disability and health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0–12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0–12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0–12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0–12Gr’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s a), repeatability (Pearson’s r) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr). Reliability properties: WHODAS 2.0–12Gr Cronbach’s a was 0.814 (p < 0.001), Pearson’s r value was 0.980 (p < 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985–0.993) (p < 0.001). Validity properties: Pearson’s r values of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0–12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from −0.169 to −0.720. WHODAS 2.0–12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0–12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 819
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [2] Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples
    MacLeod, Melissa A.
    Tremblay, Paul F.
    Graham, Kathryn
    Bernards, Sharon
    Rehm, Jurgen
    Wells, Samantha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 243 - 254
  • [3] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [4] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [6] Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Polish Version of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Patients with Huntington's Disease
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Sozanski, Bernard
    Kupczyk, Mateusz
    Leszczak, Justyna
    Kwolek, Andrzej
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II-12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients
    Abedzadeh-kalahroudi, Masoumeh
    Razi, Ebrahim
    Sehat, Mojtaba
    Asadi-Lari, Mohsen
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (05): : 1104 - 1108
  • [8] Agreement of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in parents and youth with physical illness living in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3125 - 3134
  • [9] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Wong, Jessica J.
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    De Groote, Wouter
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montse
    Acuna, angels Pont
    Cote, Pierre
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [10] A study of the psychometric properties of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a large population of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Barlund, Esa
    Mattie, Ryan
    McCormick, Zachary
    Paltamaa, Jaana
    Laimi, Katri
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (02) : 262 - 272