Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples

被引:21
|
作者
MacLeod, Melissa A. [1 ,12 ]
Tremblay, Paul F. [2 ]
Graham, Kathryn [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bernards, Sharon [1 ]
Rehm, Jurgen [1 ,3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wells, Samantha [1 ,3 ,5 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Inst Mental Hlth Policy Res, 100 Collip Circle,Suite 200, London, ON N6G 4X8, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Curtin Univ, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] PAHO WHO Collaborating Ctr Mental Hlth Addict, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Tech Univ Dresden, Epidemiol Res Unit, Klin Psychol & Psychotherapie, Dresden, Germany
[9] Univ Toronto, Grad Dept Community Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[12] Reg Waterloo Publ Hlth & Emergency Serv, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); disability; latent class analysis (LCA); WHODAS; PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES; USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE USE; NUMBER; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; DEPRESSION; CIGARETTE; SMOKING; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.1523
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a brief measurement tool used cross-culturally to capture the multi-dimensional nature of disablement through six domains, including: understanding and interacting with the world; moving and getting around; self-care; getting on with people; life activities; and participation in society. Previous psychometric research supports that the WHODAS 2.0 functions as a general factor of disablement. In a pooled dataset from community samples of adults (N=447) we used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm a one-factor structure. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals based on their patterns of responses. We identified four distinct classes, or patterns of disablement: (1) pervasive disability; (2) physical disability; (3) emotional, cognitive, or interpersonal disability; (4) no/low disability. Convergent validity of the latent class subgroups was found with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, number of days affected by disabilities, stress, mental health, and substance use. These classes offer a simple and meaningful way to classify people with disabilities based on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Focusing on individuals with a high probability of being in the first three classes may help guide interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 254
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Stasi, Sophia
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    Papageorgiou, Effie
    Tsokani, Aristi
    Bratsi, Theodora
    Papathanasiou, George
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 32 (05) : 801 - 819
  • [2] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities
    Marianna Papadopoulou
    Sophia Stasi
    Daphne Bakalidou
    Effie Papageorgiou
    Aristi Tsokani
    Theodora Bratsi
    George Papathanasiou
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2020, 32 : 801 - 819
  • [3] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [4] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), Greek Version: A Cross-Sectional Study on Applicants of Welfare Benefits
    Theotokatos, Georgios
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Angelopoulos, Theodore J.
    Chrysagis, Nikolaos K.
    Bickenbach, Jerome
    Venieri, Aikaterini
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    Grammatopoulou, Eirini
    Skordilis, Emmanouil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [6] Agreement of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in parents and youth with physical illness living in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3125 - 3134
  • [7] Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis
    Karsikas, Mika
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Juhola, Juhani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (04) : 276 - 281
  • [8] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Ma, Bernice Hua
    Chen, Gang
    Badji, Samia
    Petrie, Dennis
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 411 - 422
  • [9] Measuring Disability in Consumers of mental health services - psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Ghana
    Badu, Eric
    Mitchell, Rebecca
    O'Brien, Anthony Paul
    Osei, Akwasi
    Rubin, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (05) : 1274 - 1288
  • [10] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Bernice Hua Ma
    Gang Chen
    Samia Badji
    Dennis Petrie
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 411 - 422