Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples

被引:21
|
作者
MacLeod, Melissa A. [1 ,12 ]
Tremblay, Paul F. [2 ]
Graham, Kathryn [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bernards, Sharon [1 ]
Rehm, Jurgen [1 ,3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Wells, Samantha [1 ,3 ,5 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Inst Mental Hlth Policy Res, 100 Collip Circle,Suite 200, London, ON N6G 4X8, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Psychol, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Curtin Univ, Natl Drug Res Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
[5] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] PAHO WHO Collaborating Ctr Mental Hlth Addict, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Tech Univ Dresden, Epidemiol Res Unit, Klin Psychol & Psychotherapie, Dresden, Germany
[9] Univ Toronto, Grad Dept Community Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Inst Med Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Western Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[12] Reg Waterloo Publ Hlth & Emergency Serv, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); disability; latent class analysis (LCA); WHODAS; PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES; USE DISORDERS; SUBSTANCE USE; NUMBER; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; DEPRESSION; CIGARETTE; SMOKING; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.1523
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a brief measurement tool used cross-culturally to capture the multi-dimensional nature of disablement through six domains, including: understanding and interacting with the world; moving and getting around; self-care; getting on with people; life activities; and participation in society. Previous psychometric research supports that the WHODAS 2.0 functions as a general factor of disablement. In a pooled dataset from community samples of adults (N=447) we used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm a one-factor structure. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals based on their patterns of responses. We identified four distinct classes, or patterns of disablement: (1) pervasive disability; (2) physical disability; (3) emotional, cognitive, or interpersonal disability; (4) no/low disability. Convergent validity of the latent class subgroups was found with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, number of days affected by disabilities, stress, mental health, and substance use. These classes offer a simple and meaningful way to classify people with disabilities based on the 12-item WHODAS 2.0. Focusing on individuals with a high probability of being in the first three classes may help guide interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 254
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Cadeyrn J. Gaskin
    Sylvie D. Lambert
    Steven J. Bowe
    Liliana Orellana
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [32] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Aki Fujiwara
    Mitsuru Ida
    Katsuhiro Kimoto
    Keisuke Watanabe
    Masahiko Kawaguchi
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 81 - 85
  • [33] Validation of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in individuals with schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, and diabetes in Singapore
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Seet, Vanessa
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Tan, Sing Chik
    Mok, Yee Ming
    Verma, Swapna
    Lee, Eng Sing
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (11):
  • [34] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Fujiwara, Aki
    Ida, Mitsuru
    Kimoto, Katsuhiro
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [35] Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0
    Rajeziesfahani, Sepideh
    Federici, Stefano
    Bacci, Silvia
    Meloni, Fabio
    Bartolucci, Francesco
    Zahiroddin, Alireza
    Shams, Jamal
    Noorbakhsh, Simasadat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 48 (01) : 14 - 39
  • [36] Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II-12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients
    Abedzadeh-kalahroudi, Masoumeh
    Razi, Ebrahim
    Sehat, Mojtaba
    Asadi-Lari, Mohsen
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (05): : 1104 - 1108
  • [37] Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Predicting Institutionalization of Patients With Dementia in Taiwan
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Hu, Chaur-Jong
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (47) : e2155
  • [38] The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review
    Ciamarra, Paola
    Corbi, Graziamaria
    Gimigliano, Francesca
    Feola, Alessandro
    Campobasso, Carlo Pietro
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [39] Correspondence: Functioning assessment by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-WHODAS Reply
    Paton, Michelle
    Lane, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 67 (01) : 72 - 73
  • [40] Psychometric Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0-12-item Version in Persons with Fibromyalgia Syndrome
    Smedema, Susan Miller
    Muller, Veronica
    Yaghmaian, Rana A.
    Umucu, Emre
    Ruiz, Derek
    Chan, Fong
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2016, 82 (03) : 28 - 35