Novel scintillation detector design and performance for proton radiography and computed tomography

被引:63
|
作者
Bashkirov, V. A. [1 ]
Schulte, R. W. [1 ]
Hurley, R. F. [1 ]
Johnson, R. P. [2 ]
Sadrozinski, H. F. -W. [2 ]
Zatserklyaniy, A. [2 ]
Plautz, T. [2 ]
Giacometti, V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Basic Sci, 11175 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Phys, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
proton computed tomography; proton radiography; proton therapy; WEPL; proton energy detector; proton range measurement;
D O I
10.1118/1.4939255
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Proton computed tomography (pCT) will enable accurate prediction of proton and ion range in a patient while providing the benefit of lower radiation exposure than in x-ray CT. The accuracy of the range prediction is essential for treatment planning in proton or ion therapy and depends upon the detector used to evaluate the water-equivalent path length (WEPL) of a proton passing through the object. A novel approach is presented for an inexpensive WEPL detector for pCT and proton radiography. Methods: A novel multistage detector with an aperture of 10 x 37.5 cm was designed to optimize the accuracy of the WEPL measurements while simplifying detector construction and the performance requirements of its components. The design of the five-stage detector was optimized through simulations based on the GEANT4 detector simulation toolkit, and the fabricated prototype was calibrated in water-equivalent millimeters with 200 MeV protons in the research beam line of the clinical proton synchrotron at Loma Linda University Medical Center. A special polystyrene step phantom was designed and built to speed up and simplify the calibration procedure. The calibrated five-stage detector was tested in the 200 MeV proton beam as part of the pCT head scanner, using a water phantom and polystyrene slabs to verify the WEPL reconstruction accuracy. Results: The beam-test results demonstrated excellent performance of the new detector, in good agreement with the simulation results. The WEPL measurement accuracy is about 3 0 mm per proton in the 0-260 mm WEPL range required for a pCT head scan with a 200 MeV proton beam. Conclusions: The new multistage design approach to WEPL measurements for proton CT and radiography has been prototyped and tested. The test results show that the design is competitive with much more expensive calorimeter and range-counter designs. (C) 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 674
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detector Performance for Past Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography
    Winch, Nicola M.
    Madden, Amanda C.
    Hunter, James F.
    Nelson, Ronald O.
    2017 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2017,
  • [2] SCINTILLATION DETECTOR IN COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    GILAR, O
    PAVLICEK, Z
    JURSOVA, L
    JADERNA ENERGIE, 1984, 30 (07): : 248 - 250
  • [3] Proton Computed Tomography and Proton Radiography with a Fast Monolithic Proton Imaging System
    DeJongh, D.
    DeJongh, E.
    Rykalin, V.
    Welsh, J.
    Pankuch, M.
    Karonis, N.
    Ordonez, C.
    Duffin, K.
    Winans, J.
    Coutrakon, G.
    Sarosiek, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E148 - E148
  • [4] Development of a proton Computed Tomography detector system
    Naimuddin, Md.
    Coutrakon, G.
    Blazey, G.
    Boi, S.
    Dyshkant, A.
    Erdelyi, B.
    Hedin, D.
    Johnson, E.
    Krider, J.
    Rukalin, V.
    Uzunyan, S. A.
    Zutshi, V.
    Fordt, R.
    Sellberg, G.
    Rauch, J. E.
    Roman, M.
    Rubinov, P.
    Wilson, P.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2016, 11
  • [5] Detector Development for Proton Computed Tomography (pCT)
    Sadrozinski, H. F. -W.
    Bashkirov, V.
    Colby, B.
    Coutrakon, G.
    Erdelyi, B.
    Fusi, D.
    Hurley, F.
    Johnson, R. P.
    Kashiguine, S.
    McAllister, S.
    Martinez-McKinney, F.
    Missaghian, J.
    Scaringella, M.
    Penfold, S.
    Rykalin, V.
    Schulte, R.
    Schubert, K.
    Steinberg, D.
    Zatserklaniy, A.
    2011 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2011, : 4457 - 4461
  • [6] Analytical simulator of proton radiography and tomography for different detector configurations
    Gianoli, Chiara
    Meyer, Sebastian
    Magallanes, Lorena
    Paganelli, Chiara
    Baroni, Guido
    Parodi, Katia
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 59 : 92 - 99
  • [7] Proton radiography and computed tomography with dynamic water range shifter
    Park, Seyjoon
    Jeong, Chiyoung
    Lee, Jiseoc
    Cho, Seungryong
    Shin, Jae-ik
    Jeong, Jong Hwi
    Kim, Haksoo
    Jo, Kwanghyun
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Park, Jeong-Hoon
    Shin, Dongho
    Lim, Young Kyung
    Lee, Se Byeong
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2017, 12
  • [8] An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems
    Samei, E
    Flynn, MJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (04) : 447 - 459
  • [9] Proton radiography and proton computed tomography based on time-resolved dose measurements
    Testa, Mauro
    Verburg, Joost M.
    Rose, Mark
    Min, Chul Hee
    Tang, Shikui
    Bentefour, El Hassane
    Paganetti, Harald
    Lu, Hsiao-Ming
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (22): : 8215 - 8233
  • [10] Flat-Panel Detector Computed Tomography Imaging Observer Performance in Detecting Pulmonary Nodules in Comparison With Conventional Chest Radiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography
    Otani, Hideji
    Nitta, Norihisa
    Ikeda, Mitsuru
    Nagatani, Yukihiro
    Tanaka, Toyohiko
    Kitahara, Hitoshi
    Murakami, Yoko
    Takahashi, Masashi
    Murata, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2012, 27 (01) : 51 - 57