Performance Comparison of Next Generation Sequencing Platforms

被引：0

作者：

Erguner, Bekir ^{[1
,2
]}

Ustek, Duran ^{[3
]}

Sagiroglu, Mahmut S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] BILGEM TUBITAK, Adv Genom & Bioinformat Res Ctr, TR-41470 Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey

[2] Sabanci Univ, Mol Biol Genet & Bioengn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey

[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Med Genet, Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC) | 2015年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Next Generation DNA Sequencing technologies offer ultra high sequencing throughput for very low prices. The increase in throughput and diminished costs open up new research areas. Moreover, number of clinicians utilizing DNA sequencing keeps growing. One of the main concern for researchers and clinicians who are adopting these platforms is their sequencing accuracy. We compared three of the most commonly used Next Generation Sequencing platforms; Ion Torrent from Life Technologies, GS FLX+ from Roche and HiSeq 2000 from Illumina.

引用

页码：6453 / 6456

页数：4

共 50 条

[41] Comparison of next generation sequencing (NGS) and aCGH for PGS
Kung, A.
Wells, D.
Munne, S.
Kaur, K.
Taylor, J.
Fragouli, E.
Colls, P.
Ribustello, L.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 17 - 17
[42] Comparison of next generation sequencing technologies for transcriptome characterization
Wall, P. Kerr
Leebens-Mack, Jim
Chanderbali, Andre S.
Barakat, Abdelali
Wolcott, Erik
Liang, Haiying
Landherr, Lena
Tomsho, Lynn P.
Hu, Yi
Carlson, John E.
Ma, Hong
Schuster, Stephan C.
Soltis, Douglas E.
Soltis, Pamela S.
Altman, Naomi
dePamphilis, Claude W.
BMC GENOMICS, 2009, 10
[43] Comparison of next generation sequencing technologies for transcriptome characterization
P Kerr Wall
Jim Leebens-Mack
André S Chanderbali
Abdelali Barakat
Erik Wolcott
Haiying Liang
Lena Landherr
Lynn P Tomsho
Yi Hu
John E Carlson
Hong Ma
Stephan C Schuster
Douglas E Soltis
Pamela S Soltis
Naomi Altman
Claude W dePamphilis
BMC Genomics, 10
[44] Comparison of DNA Quantification Methods for Next Generation Sequencing
Jérôme D. Robin
Andrew T. Ludlow
Ryan LaRanger
Woodring E. Wright
Jerry W. Shay
Scientific Reports, 6
[45] Comparison of DNA Quantification Methods for Next Generation Sequencing
Robin, Jerome D.
Ludlow, Andrew T.
LaRanger, Ryan
Wright, Woodring E.
Shay, Jerry W.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[46] Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms
Lam, Hugo Y. K.
Clark, Michael J.
Chen, Rui
Chen, Rong
Natsoulis, Georges
O'Huallachain, Maeve
Dewey, Frederick E.
Habegger, Lukas
Ashley, Euan A.
Gerstein, Mark B.
Butte, Atul J.
Ji, Hanlee P.
Snyder, Michael
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 78 - U118
[47] Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms
Hugo Y K Lam
Michael J Clark
Rui Chen
Rong Chen
Georges Natsoulis
Maeve O'Huallachain
Frederick E Dewey
Lukas Habegger
Euan A Ashley
Mark B Gerstein
Atul J Butte
Hanlee P Ji
Michael Snyder
Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30 : 78 - 82
[48] Multicore SIMD ASIP for Next-Generation Sequencing and Alignment Biochip Platforms
Neves, Nuno
Sebastiao, Nuno
Matos, David
Tomas, Pedro
Flores, Paulo
Roma, Nuno
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VERY LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION (VLSI) SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (07) : 1287 - 1300
[49] Applying Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms for Pharmacogenomic Testing in Clinical Practice
Tafazoli, Alireza
Guchelaar, Henk-Jan
Miltyk, Wojciech
Kretowski, Adam J.
Swen, Jesse J.
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
[50] Assessment of next generation platforms and use of duplicate runs for whole exome sequencing
DeRycke, Melissa S.
Gunawardena, Shanaka R.
Middha, Sumit
McDonnell, Shannon K.
Eckloff, Bruce W.
Asmann, Yan W.
Schaid, Daniel J.
Goode, Ellen L.
Thibodeau, Stephen N.
CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71

← 1 2 3 4 5 →