Performance Comparison of Next Generation Sequencing Platforms

被引：0

作者：

Erguner, Bekir ^{[1
,2
]}

Ustek, Duran ^{[3
]}

Sagiroglu, Mahmut S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] BILGEM TUBITAK, Adv Genom & Bioinformat Res Ctr, TR-41470 Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey

[2] Sabanci Univ, Mol Biol Genet & Bioengn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey

[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Med Genet, Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC) | 2015年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Next Generation DNA Sequencing technologies offer ultra high sequencing throughput for very low prices. The increase in throughput and diminished costs open up new research areas. Moreover, number of clinicians utilizing DNA sequencing keeps growing. One of the main concern for researchers and clinicians who are adopting these platforms is their sequencing accuracy. We compared three of the most commonly used Next Generation Sequencing platforms; Ion Torrent from Life Technologies, GS FLX+ from Roche and HiSeq 2000 from Illumina.

引用

页码：6453 / 6456

页数：4

共 50 条

[11] Comparison of 2 Commercially Available Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Oncology
Kuderer, Nicole M.
Burton, Kimberly A.
Blau, Sibel
Rose, Andrea L.
Parker, Stephanie
Lyman, Gary H.
Blau, C. Anthony
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2017, 3 (07) : 996 - 998
[12] Comparison of next generation sequencing platforms and library preparation for the analysis of metagenomic diversity
Sherman, D.
Stone, A. L.
King, J.
Bronzato, A.
Schneider, W.
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 107 (12) : 56 - 56
[13] Author Correction: Performance assessment of DNA sequencing platforms in the ABRF Next-Generation Sequencing Study
Jonathan Foox
Scott W. Tighe
Charles M. Nicolet
Justin M. Zook
Marta Byrska-Bishop
Wayne E. Clarke
Michael M. Khayat
Medhat Mahmoud
Phoebe K. Laaguiby
Zachary T. Herbert
Derek Warner
George S. Grills
Jin Jen
Shawn Levy
Jenny Xiang
Alicia Alonso
Xia Zhao
Wenwei Zhang
Fei Teng
Yonggang Zhao
Haorong Lu
Gary P. Schroth
Giuseppe Narzisi
William Farmerie
Fritz J. Sedlazeck
Don A. Baldwin
Christopher E. Mason
Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39 : 1466 - 1466
[14] Comparison of Sequence Reads Obtained from Three Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms
Suzuki, Shingo
Ono, Naoaki
Furusawa, Chikara
Ying, Bei-Wen
Yomo, Tetsuya
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05):
[15] Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and Mutation-Specific Platforms in Clinical Practice
Hinrichs, John W. J.
Van Blokland, W. T. Marja
Moons, Michiel J.
Radersma, Remco D.
Radersma-Van Loon, Joyce H.
de Voijs, Carmen M. A.
Rappel, Sophie B.
Koudijs, Marco J.
Besselink, Nicolle J. M.
Willems, Stefan M.
de Weger, Roel A.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 143 (04) : 573 - 578
[16] Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS): Platforms and Applications
Mandlik, Jyoti S.
Patil, Amol S.
Singh, Sarita
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S41 - S45
[17] Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
Olivier Harismendy
Pauline C Ng
Robert L Strausberg
Xiaoyun Wang
Timothy B Stockwell
Karen Y Beeson
Nicholas J Schork
Sarah S Murray
Eric J Topol
Samuel Levy
Kelly A Frazer
Genome Biology, 10
[18] Sequencing of BAC pools by different next generation sequencing platforms and strategies
Taudien S.
Steuernagel B.
Ariyadasa R.
Schulte D.
Schmutzer T.
Groth M.
Felder M.
Petzold A.
Scholz U.
Mayer K.F.
Stein N.
Platzer M.
BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
[19] Evaluation of three next generation sequencing platforms for immune repertoire sequencing
Wang, Chunlin
Levy, Shawn
Yang, Qunying
Byrne-Steele, Miranda
Han, Jian
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 188
[20] Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies
Harismendy, Olivier
Ng, Pauline C.
Strausberg, Robert L.
Wang, Xiaoyun
Stockwell, Timothy B.
Beeson, Karen Y.
Schork, Nicholas J.
Murray, Sarah S.
Topol, Eric J.
Levy, Samuel
Frazer, Kelly A.
GENOME BIOLOGY, 2009, 10 (03):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →