Performance Comparison of Next Generation Sequencing Platforms

被引：0

作者：

Erguner, Bekir ^{[1
,2
]}

Ustek, Duran ^{[3
]}

Sagiroglu, Mahmut S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] BILGEM TUBITAK, Adv Genom & Bioinformat Res Ctr, TR-41470 Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey

[2] Sabanci Univ, Mol Biol Genet & Bioengn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey

[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Med Genet, Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC) | 2015年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Next Generation DNA Sequencing technologies offer ultra high sequencing throughput for very low prices. The increase in throughput and diminished costs open up new research areas. Moreover, number of clinicians utilizing DNA sequencing keeps growing. One of the main concern for researchers and clinicians who are adopting these platforms is their sequencing accuracy. We compared three of the most commonly used Next Generation Sequencing platforms; Ion Torrent from Life Technologies, GS FLX+ from Roche and HiSeq 2000 from Illumina.

引用

页码：6453 / 6456

页数：4

共 50 条

[21] RETRACTED: A Comprehensive Review of Performance of Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms (Retracted Article)
Pervez, Muhammad Tariq
Hasnain, Mirza Jawad ul
Abbas, Syed Hassan
Moustafa, Mahmoud F.
Aslam, Naeem
Shah, Syed Shah Muhammad
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
[22] Towards a Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostic Service for Tumour Genotyping: A Comparison of Panels and Platforms
Burghel, George J.
Hurst, Carolyn D.
Watson, Christopher M.
Chambers, Phillip A.
Dickinson, Helen
Roberts, Paul
Knowles, Andmargaret A.
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
[23] Base-calling for next-generation sequencing platforms
Ledergerber, Christian
Dessimoz, Christophe
BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 12 (05) : 489 - 497
[24] The performance of homopolymer detection using dichromatic and tetrachromatic fluorogenic next-generation sequencing platforms
Chen, Huijuan
Wang, Bing
Cai, Lili
Zhang, Yiran
Shu, Yingshuang
Liu, Wen
Leng, Xue
Zhai, Jincheng
Niu, Beifang
Zhou, Qiming
Cao, Shunan
BMC GENOMICS, 2024, 25 (01):
[25] Performance evaluation of Sanger sequencing for the diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria and comparison with targeted next generation sequencing
Williams, Emma L.
Bagg, Eleanor A. L.
Mueller, Michael
Vandrovcova, Jana
Aitman, Timothy J.
Rumsby, Gill
MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (01): : 69 - 78
[26] Percutaneous Lung Biopsy for Genomic Assessment: Comparison between Two Different next Generation Sequencing Platforms
Lima, Livia Maria Frota
Sabir, Sharjeel
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) : S544 - S544
[27] Performance Comparison of Commercially Available Gene Fusion Next Generation Sequencing Panels
Bartow, K. E.
Springborn, S.
Mackinnon, A. C.
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 19 (06): : 1027 - 1027
[28] Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems
Liu, Lin
Li, Yinhu
Li, Siliang
Hu, Ni
He, Yimin
Pong, Ray
Lin, Danni
Lu, Lihua
Law, Maggie
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012,
[29] Next-generation sequencing: a short comparison
Stangier, Kerstin A.
LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 33 (05): : 267 - 270
[30] Application of next generation qPCR and sequencing platforms to mRNA biomarker analysis
Devonshire, Alison S.
Sanders, Rebecca
Wilkes, Timothy M.
Taylor, Martin S.
Foy, Carole A.
Huggett, Jim F.
METHODS, 2013, 59 (01) : 89 - 100

← 1 2 3 4 5 →