Performance Comparison of Next Generation Sequencing Platforms

被引：0

作者：

Erguner, Bekir ^{[1
,2
]}

Ustek, Duran ^{[3
]}

Sagiroglu, Mahmut S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] BILGEM TUBITAK, Adv Genom & Bioinformat Res Ctr, TR-41470 Gebze, KOCAELI, Turkey

[2] Sabanci Univ, Mol Biol Genet & Bioengn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey

[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Med Genet, Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC) | 2015年

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

Next Generation DNA Sequencing technologies offer ultra high sequencing throughput for very low prices. The increase in throughput and diminished costs open up new research areas. Moreover, number of clinicians utilizing DNA sequencing keeps growing. One of the main concern for researchers and clinicians who are adopting these platforms is their sequencing accuracy. We compared three of the most commonly used Next Generation Sequencing platforms; Ion Torrent from Life Technologies, GS FLX+ from Roche and HiSeq 2000 from Illumina.

引用

页码：6453 / 6456

页数：4

共 50 条

[31] USE OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING PLATFORMS TO IDENTIFY SCHIZOPHRENIA GENES
Hodgkinson, Colin
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2011, 37 : 71 - 71
[32] New Next Generation Sequencing Platforms (NGS) Versus Tailored Panels
Wistuba, I.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (11) : S1161 - S1161
[33] Next generation sequencing performance in osteogenesis imperfecta
Monnot, S.
Baujat, G.
Michot, C.
Litzler, J.
Tourre, A.
Bonnefont, J.
Steffann, J.
Cormier-Daire, V.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1292 - 1293
[34] Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Panels and Platforms for Detection and Verification of Somatic Tumor Variants for Clinical Diagnostics
Misyura, Maksym
Zhang, Tong
Sukhai, Mahadeo A.
Thomas, Mariam
Garg, Swati
Kamel-Reid, Suzanne
Stockley, Tracy L.
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2016, 18 (06): : 842 - 850
[35] Evaluation of Oligonucleotide Sequence Capture Arrays and Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms for Use in Molecular Diagnostics
Hoppman-Chaney, Nicole
Peterson, Lisa M.
Klee, Eric W.
Middha, Sumit
Courteau, Laura K.
Ferber, Matthew J.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 56 (08) : 1297 - 1306
[36] A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers
Michael A Quail
Miriam Smith
Paul Coupland
Thomas D Otto
Simon R Harris
Thomas R Connor
Anna Bertoni
Harold P Swerdlow
Yong Gu
BMC Genomics, 13
[37] A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers
Quail, Michael A.
Smith, Miriam
Coupland, Paul
Otto, Thomas D.
Harris, Simon R.
Connor, Thomas R.
Bertoni, Anna
Swerdlow, Harold P.
Gu, Yong
BMC GENOMICS, 2012, 13
[38] Comparison of Sequencing-by-Synthesis and Avidity Base Chemistry Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Identifying Somatic Variants of Hematological Malignancies
Lim, Min Hui
Kim, Juwuk
Tu, Zheng Jin
Cheng, Yu-Wei
JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2025,
[39] Comparison of the experimental methods in haplotype sequencing via next generation sequencing
Jing Tu
Na Lu
Mengqin Duan
An Ju
Xiao Sun
Zuhong Lu
Quantitative Biology, 2016, 4 (02) : 106 - 114
[40] Performance of the AVENIO ctDNA assays across multiple high-throughput next-generation sequencing platforms
Choi, Jonathan
Dannebaum, Richard
Singh, Ashla
Foley, Rob
Dinis, Jorge
Choi, Cindy
Min, Bosun
Li, Jingchuan
Feng, Liang
Casey, Fergal
Jin, Janet
CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →