Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of elective induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks of gestation on cesarean delivery rates. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a military tertiary care medical center that serves active-duty as well as beneficiaries of active-duty and retired military personnel. All women who met the inclusion criteria of between 38 0/ 7 weeks and 38 6/ 7 weeks of gestation were invited to participate. Eligible women were at least 18 years of age, nulliparous, with a singleton gestation and a Bishop score of 5 or less. The induction of labor group was induced within 1 week of enrollment but not before 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation. The control group continued routine prenatal care with admission for labor or obstetric indication. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Assuming a 20% rate in women in a control group, 80% power, and a goal to detect a 2-fold increase to 40% in the induction of labor group, 162 patients were needed. Secondary outcomes included the following: number of scheduled prenatal visits after randomization, unscheduled clinic or triage visits, number of antepartum fetal testing appointments, gestational age and Bishop score at admission, admission diagnosis (including indication for induction if applicable), and indications for operative deliveries. Between 2010 and 2014, a total of 916 patients were assessed for study eligibility, and 162 were enrolled. The study patients were primarily young and white, and the baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The cesarean delivery rate in the induction of labor group was 30.5% (25/ 82) compared with 17.7% (14/ 79) in the expectant management group (relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-3.06). The results of the study concluded that in nulliparous women with a Bishop score of 5 or less elective induction after 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management of pregnancy did not double the rate of cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 198
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: A reasonable option?
    Madar, H.
    Sentilhes, L.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2020, 48 (04): : 344 - 345
  • [32] Impact of labor induction at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management on maternal and perinatal morbidity among a cohort of low-risk women
    Burn, Sabrina C.
    Yao, Ruofan
    Diaz, Maria
    Rossi, Jordan
    Contag, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 9208 - 9214
  • [33] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Lacevic, Jasmin
    Reljic, Tea
    Hozo, Iztok
    Gibson, Kelly S.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Djulbegovic, Benjamin
    Lockwood, Charles J.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [34] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management until week 40
    Zhou, Clarice G.
    Frank, Zoe C.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S359 - S360
  • [35] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management in Women With Prior Cesarean Delivery
    Shepherd, Megan C.
    Lee, Alan
    Olson, Gayle
    Saad, Antonio
    Saade, George R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [36] Pregnant women's willingness to participate in a randomized trial comparing induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management: A survey in the Netherlands
    Croll, Dorothee M. R.
    Meuleman, Tessa
    de Heus, Roel
    Boer, Marjon A. de
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 273 : 7 - 11
  • [37] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF INDUCTION AT 42 WEEKS GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT FOR POSTDATES PREGNANCIES
    WITTER, FR
    WEITZ, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1987, 4 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [38] Elective induction in low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks' gestation: is it worse changing obstetrical practices?
    Vouga, Manon
    Desseauve, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (02) : 371 - 371
  • [39] INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN: IS IT COST-EFFECTIVE?
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Little, Sarah
    Odibo, Anthony
    Stamilio, David
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : S68 - S68
  • [40] Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial
    Garabedian, C.
    Tillouche, N.
    Drumez, E.
    Labreuche, J.
    Dreyfus, M.
    Deruelle, P.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (09)