Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of elective induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks of gestation on cesarean delivery rates. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a military tertiary care medical center that serves active-duty as well as beneficiaries of active-duty and retired military personnel. All women who met the inclusion criteria of between 38 0/ 7 weeks and 38 6/ 7 weeks of gestation were invited to participate. Eligible women were at least 18 years of age, nulliparous, with a singleton gestation and a Bishop score of 5 or less. The induction of labor group was induced within 1 week of enrollment but not before 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation. The control group continued routine prenatal care with admission for labor or obstetric indication. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Assuming a 20% rate in women in a control group, 80% power, and a goal to detect a 2-fold increase to 40% in the induction of labor group, 162 patients were needed. Secondary outcomes included the following: number of scheduled prenatal visits after randomization, unscheduled clinic or triage visits, number of antepartum fetal testing appointments, gestational age and Bishop score at admission, admission diagnosis (including indication for induction if applicable), and indications for operative deliveries. Between 2010 and 2014, a total of 916 patients were assessed for study eligibility, and 162 were enrolled. The study patients were primarily young and white, and the baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The cesarean delivery rate in the induction of labor group was 30.5% (25/ 82) compared with 17.7% (14/ 79) in the expectant management group (relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-3.06). The results of the study concluded that in nulliparous women with a Bishop score of 5 or less elective induction after 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management of pregnancy did not double the rate of cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 198
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcome of induction of labor versus expectant management among obese women at or after 39 weeks
    Palatnik, Anna
    Kominiarek, Michelle
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S69 - S70
  • [42] Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    van der Ham, David P.
    Vijgen, Sylvia M. C.
    Nijhuis, Jan G.
    van Beek, Johannes J.
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Mulder, Antonius L. M.
    Moonen, Rob
    Groenewout, Mariet
    van Pampus, Marielle G.
    Mantel, Gerald D.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    van Wijngaarden, Wim J.
    Sikkema, Marko
    Haak, Monique C.
    Pernet, Paula J. M.
    Porath, Martina
    Molkenboer, Jan F. M.
    Kuppens, Simone
    Kwee, Anneke
    Kars, Michael E.
    Woiski, Mallory
    Weinans, Martin J. N.
    Wildschut, Hajo I. J.
    Akerboom, Bettina M. C.
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Willekes, Christine
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (04):
  • [43] To the question of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, the answer lies in the question
    Rozenberg, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (05): : 481 - 488
  • [44] Effects of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial on Elective Induction and Obstetric Outcomes in Term Nulliparous Patients
    Nethery, Elizabeth
    Levy, Barbara
    McLean, Kate
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Souter, Vivienne L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (02): : 242 - 250
  • [45] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03): : 597 - 606
  • [46] Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor Compared with Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women Aged 35 Years or Older
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    Bowers, Katherine
    Khoury, Jane C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [47] Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women (vol 134, pg 134, 2019)
    Sinkey
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 134 (04): : 884 - 884
  • [48] Early Compared With Late Neuraxial Analgesia in Nulliparous Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wong, Cynthia A.
    McCarthy, Robert J.
    Sullivan, John T.
    Scavone, Barbara M.
    Gerber, Susan E.
    Yaghmour, Edward A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (05): : 1066 - 1074
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Little, Sarah E.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Grobman, William A.
    Long, Elisa F.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 (02) : 137.e1 - 137.e9
  • [50] Outcomes among women undergoing elective induction of labor compared to expectant management by maternal BMI
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S523 - S523