Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of elective induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks of gestation on cesarean delivery rates. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a military tertiary care medical center that serves active-duty as well as beneficiaries of active-duty and retired military personnel. All women who met the inclusion criteria of between 38 0/ 7 weeks and 38 6/ 7 weeks of gestation were invited to participate. Eligible women were at least 18 years of age, nulliparous, with a singleton gestation and a Bishop score of 5 or less. The induction of labor group was induced within 1 week of enrollment but not before 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation. The control group continued routine prenatal care with admission for labor or obstetric indication. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Assuming a 20% rate in women in a control group, 80% power, and a goal to detect a 2-fold increase to 40% in the induction of labor group, 162 patients were needed. Secondary outcomes included the following: number of scheduled prenatal visits after randomization, unscheduled clinic or triage visits, number of antepartum fetal testing appointments, gestational age and Bishop score at admission, admission diagnosis (including indication for induction if applicable), and indications for operative deliveries. Between 2010 and 2014, a total of 916 patients were assessed for study eligibility, and 162 were enrolled. The study patients were primarily young and white, and the baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The cesarean delivery rate in the induction of labor group was 30.5% (25/ 82) compared with 17.7% (14/ 79) in the expectant management group (relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-3.06). The results of the study concluded that in nulliparous women with a Bishop score of 5 or less elective induction after 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management of pregnancy did not double the rate of cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 198
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Urbanowicz, Erin
    Garg, Bharti
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e1061 - e1068
  • [22] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management in Low-Risk Parous Women
    Wagner, Stephen M.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Grobman, William A.
    Bailit, Jennifer L.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Prasad, Mona
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Saade, George R.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05) : 519 - 525
  • [23] Labor induction at 39 weeks compared with expectant management in low-risk parous women
    Wagner, Stephen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S365 - S366
  • [24] Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk multiparous women
    Sinkey, Rachel G.
    Blanchard, Christina T.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S21 - S22
  • [25] Labor Induction at 41+0 Gestational Weeks or Expectant Management for the Nulliparous Woman: The Finnish Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Place, Katariina
    Rahkonen, Leena
    Tekay, Aydin
    Vayrynen, Kirsi
    Orden, Maija-Riitta
    Vaarasmaki, Marja
    Uotila, Jukka
    Tihtonen, Kati
    Rinne, Kirsi
    Makikallio, Kaarin
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Kruit, Heidi
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (09) : 502 - 503
  • [26] Labor induction at 41+0 gestational weeks or expectant management for the nulliparous woman: The Finnish randomized controlled multicenter trial
    Place, Katariina
    Rahkonen, Leena
    Tekay, Aydin
    Vayrynen, Kirsi
    Orden, Maija-Riitta
    Vaarasmaki, Marja
    Uotila, Jukka
    Tihtonen, Kati
    Rinne, Kirsi
    Makikallio, Kaarin
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Kruit, Heidi
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2024, 103 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [27] Maternal Outcomes Associated With Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management
    Rossi, Jordan
    Contag, Stephen
    Burn, Sabrina
    Diaz, Maria
    Yao, Ruofan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 111S - 112S
  • [28] Should we offer elective induction of labor to nulliparous women at 39 weeks? REPLY
    Grobman, William A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (03) : 288 - 289
  • [29] Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies
    Lewis, Susan
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Schorn, Mavis
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [30] Elective Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women With a Favorable Cervix EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Osmundson, Sarah S.
    Ou-Yang, Robin J.
    Grobman, William A.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2010, 65 (12) : 761 - 762