Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (03): : 597 - 606
  • [2] The effectivity of balloon catheter for labor induction in post-term pregnancy
    Sulchan, S
    Risanto, S
    Lisnur, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF 54TH ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, : 59 - 65
  • [3] Outpatient Foley catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a randomized-controlled trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S759 - S759
  • [4] Women's experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy
    Heimstad, Runa
    Romundstad, Pal R.
    Hyett, Jon
    Mattsson, Lars-Ake
    Salvesen, Kjell A.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (08) : 950 - 956
  • [5] Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
    Grobman, William A.
    Rice, Madeline M.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Perez-Delboy, Annette
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Boggess, Kim A.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (06): : 513 - 523
  • [7] Balloon catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at term
    Wolff, KS
    Swahn, ML
    Westgren, M
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1998, 46 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [8] Effects of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial on Elective Induction and Obstetric Outcomes in Term Nulliparous Patients
    Nethery, Elizabeth
    Levy, Barbara
    McLean, Kate
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Souter, Vivienne L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (02): : 242 - 250
  • [10] Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone
    Suffecool, Katarzyna
    Rosenn, Barak M.
    Kam, Stefanie
    Mushi, Juliet
    Foroutan, Janelle
    Herrera, Kimberly
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (02) : 213 - 218