Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations
    Kandil, Mohamed
    Emarh, Mohamed
    Sayyed, Tarek
    Masood, Alaa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 286 (02) : 303 - 307
  • [22] Labor Induction in Women with an Unfavorable Cervix: Randomized Controlled Trial of Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone.
    Suffecool, Katarzyna
    Rosenn, Barak
    Forutan, Janelle
    Herrera, Kimberly
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2013, 20 (S3) : 333A - 333A
  • [23] Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week – 42 week dilemma
    Joep C Kortekaas
    Aafke Bruinsma
    Judit KJ Keulen
    Jeroen van Dillen
    Martijn A Oudijk
    Joost J Zwart
    Jannet JH Bakker
    Dokie de Bont
    Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
    Pien M Offerhaus
    Anton H van Kaam
    Frank Vandenbussche
    Ben Willem J Mol
    Esteriek de Miranda
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14
  • [24] Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study
    Gonen, O
    Rosen, DJD
    Dolfin, Z
    Tepper, R
    Markov, S
    Fejgin, MD
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (06): : 913 - 917
  • [25] A randomized controlled trial on early induction compared to expectant management of nulliparous women with prolonged latent phases
    Brane, Elena
    Olsson, Ann
    Andolf, Ellika
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 93 (10) : 1042 - 1049
  • [26] Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reply
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 132 (04): : 1063 - 1063
  • [27] Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study
    Shindo, Ryosuke
    Aoki, Shigeru
    Yonemoto, Naohiro
    Yamamoto, Yuriko
    Kasai, Junko
    Kasai, Michi
    Miyagi, Etsuko
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12):
  • [28] Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies
    Lewis, Susan
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Schorn, Mavis
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (02) : 170 - 177
  • [29] Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06): : 1258 - 1264
  • [30] Elective induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial in India (ELITE-39 trial)
    Lalithadevi, Palaparthi
    Rengaraj, Sasirekha
    Dasari, Paapa
    Adhisivam, Bethovu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (01) : 427 - 433