Outpatient balloon catheter versus expectant management for post-term labor induction in nulliparous women: A randomized trial

被引:0
|
作者
Garabedian, C. [1 ,2 ]
Tillouche, N. [3 ]
Drumez, E. [4 ]
Labreuche, J. [4 ]
Dreyfus, M. [5 ]
Deruelle, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, Dept Obstet, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, ULR METRICS 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] CH Valenciennes, Dept Obstet, F-59300 Valenciennes, France
[4] CHU Lille, Dept Stat, F-59000 Lille, France
[5] CHU Caen, Dept Obstet, F-14000 Caen, France
[6] CHU Montpellier, Dept Obstet, F-34000 Caen, France
关键词
Term pregnancy; Mechanical method; Balloon; Cesarean; Home induction; FOLEY CATHETER; PREGNANCIES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102822
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Increased use of labor induction has renewed interest in outpatient cervical ripening. Post-term pregnancy (i.e., >= 41 weeks) is a specific situation of increased neonatal risk, including greater risk of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcomes. While a high proportion of these patients will need induction, outpatient management of this specific population has never been studied. Therefore, our objective was to compare two policies of management of post term pregnancies: the use of a transcervical Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening compared with expectant management. Methods: Multicenter, randomized controlled open-label study comparing home induction with a Foley catheter versus expectant management. Inclusion criteria were nulliparous, live singleton fetus in a vertex position, postterm (at 41 + 4 days), requiring cervical ripening (Bishop score <6), intact membranes, and distance homehospital within 40 min. The primary endpoint was change in Bishop score beetween randomization (41 + 4 days) and consultation (41 + 5 days). Results: Forty-five women were included: 21 in the home induction group and 24 in the control group. The study was stopped due to low recruitment. The difference in Bishop score increases one day after randomization approached significance (p = 0.055), with home induction showing a larger change compared with expectant management (Cohen's d = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 1.21). Regarding change in Bishop score, 81 % of home induction group patients had a better score at 41 + 5 days versus 52.2 % in the control group (relative risk = 1.55; 95 %CI 0.99 to 2.15). Conclusion: By specifically evaluating home induction in nulliparous women with post term pregnancies, we observed a Bishop score improvement in the home induction group. These data support further evaluation of induction methods and birth experiences in a larger cohort of this population. Trial registration: The study was registered under European policy (number EudraCT 2015-A01298-41) and on www.clinitrials.gov (number NCT02932319). Date of registration: 13/10/2016, Date of initial participant enrollment: 31/03/2017
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial of foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion
    Ghanaei, Mandana M.
    Sharami, Hajar
    Asgari, Alaeddin
    JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 10 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [42] Foley catheter (80 vs 60 mL) and misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Jaryal, Sakshi
    Soni, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (08)
  • [43] Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy
    Suzuki, S
    Otsubo, Y
    Sawa, R
    Yoneyama, Y
    Araki, T
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2000, 49 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [44] Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term
    Vitner, Dana
    Hiersch, Liran
    Ashwal, Eran
    Shmueli, Anat
    Yogev, Yariv
    Aviram, Amir
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [45] Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term
    Dana Vitner
    Liran Hiersch
    Eran Ashwal
    Anat Shmueli
    Yariv Yogev
    Amir Aviram
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 300 : 79 - 86
  • [46] Induction of labor versus expectant management for women with a prior cesarean delivery
    Palatnik, Anna
    Grobman, William A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 358.e1 - 358.e6
  • [47] A randomized trial of active versus expectant management of the third stage of labor
    Hoffman, M
    Naqvi, F
    Sciscione, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S82 - S82
  • [48] Labor Induction at 41+0 Gestational Weeks or Expectant Management for the Nulliparous Woman: The Finnish Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Place, Katariina
    Rahkonen, Leena
    Tekay, Aydin
    Vayrynen, Kirsi
    Orden, Maija-Riitta
    Vaarasmaki, Marja
    Uotila, Jukka
    Tihtonen, Kati
    Rinne, Kirsi
    Makikallio, Kaarin
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Kruit, Heidi
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2024, 79 (09) : 502 - 503
  • [49] Women's experience of induction of labor using PGE2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient
    Beckmann, Michael
    Acreman, Melissa
    Schmidt, Emily
    Merollini, Katharina M. D.
    Miller, Yvette
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 249 : 1 - 6
  • [50] A randomized trial of active versus expectant management of the third stage of labor
    Hoffman, Matthew
    Castagnola, Danielle
    Naqvi, Fatima
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S107 - S107