Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
不详
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of elective induction of labor in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks of gestation on cesarean delivery rates. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted at a military tertiary care medical center that serves active-duty as well as beneficiaries of active-duty and retired military personnel. All women who met the inclusion criteria of between 38 0/ 7 weeks and 38 6/ 7 weeks of gestation were invited to participate. Eligible women were at least 18 years of age, nulliparous, with a singleton gestation and a Bishop score of 5 or less. The induction of labor group was induced within 1 week of enrollment but not before 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation. The control group continued routine prenatal care with admission for labor or obstetric indication. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Assuming a 20% rate in women in a control group, 80% power, and a goal to detect a 2-fold increase to 40% in the induction of labor group, 162 patients were needed. Secondary outcomes included the following: number of scheduled prenatal visits after randomization, unscheduled clinic or triage visits, number of antepartum fetal testing appointments, gestational age and Bishop score at admission, admission diagnosis (including indication for induction if applicable), and indications for operative deliveries. Between 2010 and 2014, a total of 916 patients were assessed for study eligibility, and 162 were enrolled. The study patients were primarily young and white, and the baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The cesarean delivery rate in the induction of labor group was 30.5% (25/ 82) compared with 17.7% (14/ 79) in the expectant management group (relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-3.06). The results of the study concluded that in nulliparous women with a Bishop score of 5 or less elective induction after 39 0/ 7 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management of pregnancy did not double the rate of cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 198
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06): : 1258 - 1264
  • [2] A randomized trial of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management of low-risk nulliparous women
    Grobman, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (01) : S601 - S601
  • [3] Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor at 39 Weeks of Gestation A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 72S - 72S
  • [4] Elective Labor Induction at 39 Weeks of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management Factors Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (04): : 692 - 697
  • [5] Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Silver, Robert M.
    Rice, Madeline Murguia
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Mallett, Gail
    Hill, Kim
    Thom, Elizabeth A.
    El-Sayed, Yasser Y.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Saade, George R.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Simhan, Hyagriv N.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (04): : 698 - 705
  • [6] Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women
    Einerson, Brett D.
    Nelson, Richard E.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Esplin, M. Sean
    Branch, D. Ware
    Metz, Torri D.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Grobman, William A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Varner, Michael
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 136 (01): : 19 - 25
  • [7] Customized Probability of Vaginal Delivery With Induction of Labor and Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Peleg, David
    Warsof, Steven L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 373 - 373
  • [8] Elective induction of labor versus expectant management at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial in India (ELITE-39 trial)
    Lalithadevi, Palaparthi
    Rengaraj, Sasirekha
    Dasari, Paapa
    Adhisivam, Bethovu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 167 (01) : 427 - 433
  • [9] Outcomes of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared to expectant management by age
    Hersh, Alyssa R.
    Schmidt, Eleanor M.
    Packer, Claire H.
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S474 - S474
  • [10] Elective Induction of Labour at 39 Weeks Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Persons Delivering in a Community Hospital
    Burrows, Adelaide
    Finkenzeller, Kristin
    Pudwell, Jessica
    Smith, Graeme
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2022, 44 (11) : 1159 - 1166