Bone Graft and Intraosseous Anchorage of Dental Implants for Reconstruction of the Residual Alveolar Ridge

被引:4
|
作者
Bali, Yashika [1 ]
Singh, Ravpreet [1 ]
Gill, Tarunpreet Kaur
Rela, Rathi [2 ]
Vatsa, Ritesh [3 ]
Priyadarshni, Priyanka [4 ]
机构
[1] BJS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[2] Nalanda Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] Sri Krishna Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
[4] Patna Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Patna, Bihar, India
来源
关键词
Bone regeneration; collagen; dental implants; guided bone regeneration; membranes; osseointegration; BARRIER MEMBRANES; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_638_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Bone grafting aims at better dental implant osseointegration and preserves the remaining alveolar bone in the socket. The success of various bone grafting materials plays a vital role in assessing future implant function. Aims and Objectives: The present clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the results of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with and without the bioresorbable membrane in the dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: The 20 patients were divided into two groups (n = 10). First was Group I- GBR with bioresorbable collagen membrane (BioGide (TM)) and second was Group II- GBR without membrane. Bone gain and bone levels were analyzed for both groups. All the collected data were analyzed statistically. Results: For Group I, bone levels at baseline were nonsignificant (P = 0.2188) Similarly, nonsignificant values were seen in both groups at 3 months with bone level values of 0.25 +/- 0.17 and 0.38 +/- 0.24 for Group I and Group II, respectively. Changes in the bone levels were found to be 2.45 +/- 0.349 and 2.58 +/- 0.304 from Group I and II, respectively, inferring the nonsignificant difference with P value of 0.3723. The percentage of bone gain for intergroup at the end of 3 months was 89.15% +/- 0.678 for Group I and 88.68% +/- 0.503%; these values were statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.982). Conclusion: Nonsignificant difference was observed between the two groups with and without membrane in terms of changes in bone level, percentage of bone gain, and bone defect reduction. This study concludes that the use of bone grafts significantly improves residual alveolar ridge irrespective of membrane used.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 468
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Augmentation of insufficient thickness of the alveolar ridge by guided bone regeneration with bone graft
    Matsuura, M
    Nomura, T
    Seto, K
    Sato, J
    Kanemura, H
    Beppu, S
    Mao, C
    3RD ASIAN CONGRESS ON ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, : 493 - 495
  • [22] Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey
    Hurzeler, MB
    Quinones, CR
    Hutmacher, D
    Schupbach, P
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (04) : 323 - 331
  • [23] Alveolar ridge reconstruction with a digitally customized bone block allograft
    Bonta, Hernan
    Bugiolachi, Juliana
    Perrote, Carla A.
    Sanchez, Luciana M.
    Manisagian, Gisela E. Pulitano
    Galli, Federico G.
    Caride, Facundo
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2023,
  • [24] Distraction osteogenesis of basal mandibular bone for reconstruction of the alveolar ridge
    Uckan, S
    Dolanmaz, D
    Kalayci, A
    Cilasun, U
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 40 (05): : 393 - 396
  • [25] Alveolar Sandwich Osteotomy in Resorbed Alveolar Ridge for Dental Implants: A 4-Year Prospective Study
    Laviv, Amir
    Jensen, Ole T.
    Tarazi, Eyal
    Casap, Nardy
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (02) : 292 - 303
  • [26] Alveolar Bone Grafting in Cleft Patients: from Bone Defect to Dental Implants
    Vuletic, Marko
    Knezevic, Predrag
    Jokic, Drazen
    Rebic, Jerko
    Zabarovic, Domagoj
    Macan, Darko
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2014, 48 (04) : 250 - 257
  • [27] The use of a bone block graft from the chin for alveolar ridge augmentation
    Zeiter, DJ
    Ries, WL
    Sanders, JJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2000, 20 (06) : 619 - 627
  • [28] Use of endosseous implants for dental reconstruction of patients with grafted alveolar clefts
    Takahashi, T
    Fukuda, M
    Yamaguchi, T
    Kochi, S
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 55 (06) : 576 - 583
  • [29] Clinical Assessment of the Bone Width Following Lateral Ridge Expansion in Augmentation of Narrow Alveolar Ridges for Placing Immediate Dental Implants
    Yadav, Bipin Kumar
    Himabindu, L.
    Thakur, Rajesh Kumar
    Alqahtani, Abdullah Saad
    Gufran, Khalid
    Tiwary, Anupam
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 986 - 990
  • [30] Alveolar ridge preservation and its impact on marginal bone level changes around dental implants: A retrospective, cohort comparative study
    Cinquini, Chiara
    Izzetti, Rossana
    Porreca, Annamaria
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Nisi, Marco
    Barone, Antonio
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (06) : 1162 - 1171