Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey

被引:68
|
作者
Hurzeler, MB
Quinones, CR
Hutmacher, D
Schupbach, P
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DENT BRANCH,DEPT STOMATOL,DIV PERIODONTOL,HOUSTON,TX 77225
[2] IBEROAMER INST PERIODONTOL & ORAL IMPLANTOL,SAN JUAN,PR
[3] POLYTECH OFFENBURG,DEPT BIOMECH & BIOMAT,OFFENBURG,GERMANY
[4] UNIV ZURICH,INST DENT,DEPT ORAL MICROBIOL & GEN IMMUNOL,ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
guided bone regeneration; bioresorbable barrier; dental implants;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080411.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate guided bone regeneration (GBR) around dental implants placed in atrophic alveolar ridges using an experimental, nonporous bioresorbable barrier. In 8 Rhesus monkeys, the maxillary canines and lateral incisors were extracted bilaterally and the remaining alveoli were reduced to create atrophic ridges. After a healing period of 3 months, soft tissue expansion was performed using a subperiosteal tissue expander. After 1 month of tissue expansion, an IMZ implant was placed in the atrophic ridge on each side in such a way that its coronal 4 mm to 5 mm remained circumferentially exposed above the bone level. The test implants were covered with a bioresorbable barrier made of poly (D,L-lactid - co-trimethylencarbonate) in a 70/30 ratio, whereas the control implants were covered with a nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) barrier. The e-PTFE barriers were stabilized with titanium minipins while the bioresorbable barriers were analogously fixed using bioresorbable minipins made of poly (L-lactid - co-D,L-lactid) 70/30. Clinical healing progressed uneventfully in both groups and no soft tissue dehiscences occurred. Histometric and histomorphometric analyses were performed 5 months post surgery. Both test and control implants exhibited direct bone-to-implant contact to variable extents. The mean direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact length fraction was 32% of the total implant length in the test sites and 58% in the control sites. Control sites exhibited significantly greater bone fill compared to the experimental sites (P<0.001). Histologic observations of test specimens demonstrated a moderate inflammatory reaction related to the degradation and resorption products of the barrier. In conclusion, the nonresorbable e-PTFE GBR barrier was found to be superior to the bioresorbable barriers tested in the present investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey (vol 8, pg 323, 1997)
    Hurzeler, MB
    Quinones, CR
    Schupbach, P
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (06) : 535 - 536
  • [2] Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads - An experimental study in the monkey
    Hurzeler, MB
    Kohal, RJ
    Naghshbandi, J
    Mota, LF
    Conradt, J
    Hutmacher, D
    Caffesse, RG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 27 (04) : 315 - 320
  • [3] Vertical ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration in association with dental implants: an experimental study in dogs
    Simion, Massimo
    Dahlin, Christer
    Rocchietta, Isabella
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Sanchez, Raquel
    Karring, Thorkild
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (01) : 86 - 94
  • [4] Guided bone regeneration at transmucosal implants using bioresorbable materials
    Haemmerle, CHF
    Lang, NP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1209 - 1209
  • [5] CELLULAR AND BACTERIAL-COLONIZATION OF BARRIER MEMBRANES UTILIZED FOR GUIDED BONE REGENERATION AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS
    UNSAL, E
    WALSH, TF
    HARRIS, D
    UNSAL, MK
    JOHNS, RB
    CELLS AND MATERIALS, 1994, 4 (03): : 309 - 315
  • [6] Enhanced bone regeneration and formation around implants using guided bone regeneration
    Bhumbra, RS
    Berman, AB
    Walker, PS
    Barrett, DS
    Blunn, GW
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 43 (02): : 162 - 167
  • [7] Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Barrier for Guided Bone Regeneration of Dehiscence Defects Around Dental Implants: A Clinical and Histological Report
    Momen-Heravi, Fatemeh
    Peters, Scott M.
    Garfinkle, Leonard
    Kang, Philip
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (04) : 521 - 524
  • [8] Guided Bone Regeneration Using Barrier Membrane in Dental Applications
    Kim, Kakyung
    Su, Yingchao
    Kucine, Allan J.
    Cheng, Ke
    Zhu, Donghui
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2023, 9 (10) : 5457 - 5478
  • [9] Supplemental periodontal regeneration by vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants. A preclinical in vivo experimental study
    Lee, Changseok
    Kim, Sungtae
    Kim, Junhwan
    Namgung, Dajeong
    Kim, Kyounghwa
    Ku, Young
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (11) : 1118 - 1125
  • [10] Bone augmentation at titanium implants using autologous bone grafts and a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the rabbit tibia
    Lundgren, AK
    Sennerby, L
    Lundgren, D
    Taylor, A
    Gottlow, J
    Nyman, S
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (02) : 82 - 89