Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey

被引:68
|
作者
Hurzeler, MB
Quinones, CR
Hutmacher, D
Schupbach, P
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DENT BRANCH,DEPT STOMATOL,DIV PERIODONTOL,HOUSTON,TX 77225
[2] IBEROAMER INST PERIODONTOL & ORAL IMPLANTOL,SAN JUAN,PR
[3] POLYTECH OFFENBURG,DEPT BIOMECH & BIOMAT,OFFENBURG,GERMANY
[4] UNIV ZURICH,INST DENT,DEPT ORAL MICROBIOL & GEN IMMUNOL,ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
guided bone regeneration; bioresorbable barrier; dental implants;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080411.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate guided bone regeneration (GBR) around dental implants placed in atrophic alveolar ridges using an experimental, nonporous bioresorbable barrier. In 8 Rhesus monkeys, the maxillary canines and lateral incisors were extracted bilaterally and the remaining alveoli were reduced to create atrophic ridges. After a healing period of 3 months, soft tissue expansion was performed using a subperiosteal tissue expander. After 1 month of tissue expansion, an IMZ implant was placed in the atrophic ridge on each side in such a way that its coronal 4 mm to 5 mm remained circumferentially exposed above the bone level. The test implants were covered with a bioresorbable barrier made of poly (D,L-lactid - co-trimethylencarbonate) in a 70/30 ratio, whereas the control implants were covered with a nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) barrier. The e-PTFE barriers were stabilized with titanium minipins while the bioresorbable barriers were analogously fixed using bioresorbable minipins made of poly (L-lactid - co-D,L-lactid) 70/30. Clinical healing progressed uneventfully in both groups and no soft tissue dehiscences occurred. Histometric and histomorphometric analyses were performed 5 months post surgery. Both test and control implants exhibited direct bone-to-implant contact to variable extents. The mean direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact length fraction was 32% of the total implant length in the test sites and 58% in the control sites. Control sites exhibited significantly greater bone fill compared to the experimental sites (P<0.001). Histologic observations of test specimens demonstrated a moderate inflammatory reaction related to the degradation and resorption products of the barrier. In conclusion, the nonresorbable e-PTFE GBR barrier was found to be superior to the bioresorbable barriers tested in the present investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Ridges with Insufficient Bones using Different Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Vaibhav, Vikas
    Sinha, Abhishek
    Bolisetty, Deepika
    Verma, Abhishek
    Kumar, Kunal
    Singh, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (05): : 225 - 228
  • [32] A volumetric study of guided bone regeneration around titanium implants in the New Zealand white rabbit
    Pal, GL
    Stevenson, A
    Klineberg, IJ
    Pearson, M
    Albrektsson, T
    Johansson, C
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 43 (02) : 73 - 80
  • [33] Guided bone regeneration with local zoledronic acid and titanium barrier: An experimental study
    Dundar, Serkan
    Ozgur, Cem
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Cakmak, Omer
    Saybak, Arif
    Ozercan, Ibrahim Hanifi
    Alan, Hilal
    Artas, Gokhan
    Nacakgedigi, Onur
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 12 (04) : 2015 - 2020
  • [34] A New Method of Measuring the Volumetric Change of Alveolar Bone Around Dental Implants Using Computed Tomography
    Lim, Young-Wook
    Lim, Young-Jun
    Kim, Bongju
    Lee, Seung-Pyo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [35] Comparison of bioabsorbable and bioinert membranes for guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants -: An experimental study in the mongrel dog
    Kohal, RJ
    Trejo, PM
    Wirsching, C
    Hürzeler, MB
    Caffesse, RG
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1999, 10 (03) : 226 - 237
  • [36] Alveolar ridge repair using resorbable membranes and autogenous bone particles with simultaneous placement of implants: An experimental pilot study in dogs
    Schliephake, H
    Dard, M
    Planck, H
    Hierlemann, H
    Stern, U
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2000, 15 (03) : 364 - 373
  • [37] In vivo experimental study comparing alveolar ridge preservation versus guided bone regeneration after unassisted socket healing at intact and damaged sites in narrow alveolar ridges
    Shin, Hae Jee
    Park, Jin-Young
    Tien, Hsu Kuo
    Strauss, Franz-Josef
    Cha, Jae-Kook
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2024,
  • [38] Guided bone regeneration with polypropylene barrier in rabbit's calvaria: A preliminary experimental study
    De Lucca, Leandro
    Marques, Marcio da Costa
    Weinfeld, Ilan
    HELIYON, 2018, 4 (06):
  • [39] Bone reactions around dental implants subjected to progressive static load: an experimental study in dogs
    Podaropoulos, Leonidas
    Veis, Alexander A.
    Trisi, Paolo
    Papadimitriou, Serafim
    Alexandridis, Constantinos
    Kalyvas, Demos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (07) : 910 - 917
  • [40] Use of a Novel In Situ Hardening Biphasic Alloplastic Bone Grafting Material for Guided Bone Regeneration around Dental Implants - A Prospective Case Series
    Levin, Liran
    Clark-Perry, Danielle
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2022, 12 (01) : 12 - 16