Guided bone regeneration around dental implants in the atrophic alveolar ridge using a bioresorbable barrier - An experimental study in the monkey

被引:68
|
作者
Hurzeler, MB
Quinones, CR
Hutmacher, D
Schupbach, P
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,DENT BRANCH,DEPT STOMATOL,DIV PERIODONTOL,HOUSTON,TX 77225
[2] IBEROAMER INST PERIODONTOL & ORAL IMPLANTOL,SAN JUAN,PR
[3] POLYTECH OFFENBURG,DEPT BIOMECH & BIOMAT,OFFENBURG,GERMANY
[4] UNIV ZURICH,INST DENT,DEPT ORAL MICROBIOL & GEN IMMUNOL,ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
guided bone regeneration; bioresorbable barrier; dental implants;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080411.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate guided bone regeneration (GBR) around dental implants placed in atrophic alveolar ridges using an experimental, nonporous bioresorbable barrier. In 8 Rhesus monkeys, the maxillary canines and lateral incisors were extracted bilaterally and the remaining alveoli were reduced to create atrophic ridges. After a healing period of 3 months, soft tissue expansion was performed using a subperiosteal tissue expander. After 1 month of tissue expansion, an IMZ implant was placed in the atrophic ridge on each side in such a way that its coronal 4 mm to 5 mm remained circumferentially exposed above the bone level. The test implants were covered with a bioresorbable barrier made of poly (D,L-lactid - co-trimethylencarbonate) in a 70/30 ratio, whereas the control implants were covered with a nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) barrier. The e-PTFE barriers were stabilized with titanium minipins while the bioresorbable barriers were analogously fixed using bioresorbable minipins made of poly (L-lactid - co-D,L-lactid) 70/30. Clinical healing progressed uneventfully in both groups and no soft tissue dehiscences occurred. Histometric and histomorphometric analyses were performed 5 months post surgery. Both test and control implants exhibited direct bone-to-implant contact to variable extents. The mean direct mineralized bone-to-implant contact length fraction was 32% of the total implant length in the test sites and 58% in the control sites. Control sites exhibited significantly greater bone fill compared to the experimental sites (P<0.001). Histologic observations of test specimens demonstrated a moderate inflammatory reaction related to the degradation and resorption products of the barrier. In conclusion, the nonresorbable e-PTFE GBR barrier was found to be superior to the bioresorbable barriers tested in the present investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 331
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical and histological findings in guided bone regeneration (GBR) around titanium dental implants with autogeneous bone chips using a new resorbable membrane
    Schlegel, K.A.
    Sindet-Pedersen, S.
    Hoepffner, H.-J.
    2000, John Wiley and Sons Inc. (53):
  • [22] Clinical and histological findings in guided bone regeneration (GBR) around titanium dental implants with autogeneous bone chips using a new resorbable membrane
    Schlegel, KA
    Sindet-Pedersen, S
    Hoepffner, HJ
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2000, 53 (04): : 392 - 399
  • [23] Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation
    Hising, P
    Bolin, A
    Branting, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2001, 16 (01) : 90 - 97
  • [24] Guided Bone Regeneration Using Autologous Plasma, Bone Marrow Cells and β-TCP/HA Granules for Experimental Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction in Macaca fascicularis
    Shamsuddin, Sharen Aini
    Ramli, Roszalina
    Razali, Masfueh
    Baharin, Badiah
    Sulaiman, Shamsul
    Ng, Min Hwei
    Low, Cheong Kiat
    Abd Jabar, Mohd Nazimi
    Nordin, Rifqah
    Yahaya, Norziha
    Shukur, Shariffah Shuriana Abdul
    Siar, Chong Huat
    Idrus, Ruszymah Bt Hj
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2017, 7 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [25] Treatment Outcome of Using Guided Bone Regeneration for Bone Augmentation for the Placement of Dental Implants - A Systematic Review
    Chandrasekaran, Deepak
    Chinnaswami, Ravindran
    Malathi, N.
    Jayakumar, N. D.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S3068 - S3070
  • [26] Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: a prospective long-term clinical study
    De Boever, AL
    De Boever, JA
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (05) : 549 - 556
  • [27] Tetracycline impregnated bone grafts in the management of peri-implantitis and guided bone regeneration around dental implants: A systematic review
    Shrivastava, Priyanshu Kumar
    Mahmood, Arifa
    Datta, Shubham
    Sengar, Poonam
    Sybil, Deborah
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 34 (08) : 689 - 698
  • [28] Vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants using a membrane technique and autogenous bone or allografts in humans
    Simion, M
    Jovanovic, SA
    Trisi, P
    Scarano, A
    Piattelli, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 1998, 18 (01) : 9 - 23
  • [29] Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants using a resorbable membrane vs a PTFE membrane
    Schliephake, H
    Dard, M
    Planck, H
    Hierlemann, H
    Jakob, A
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (03) : 230 - 241
  • [30] Radiographic Evaluation of the Alveolar Ridge Splitting Technique Combined with Guided Bone Regeneration vs Guided Bone Regeneration Alone in the Anterior Maxilla: A Retrospective Controlled Study
    Zhang, Lulu
    Huang, Yuanding
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 41 (05) : 751 - +