Bone Graft and Intraosseous Anchorage of Dental Implants for Reconstruction of the Residual Alveolar Ridge

被引:4
|
作者
Bali, Yashika [1 ]
Singh, Ravpreet [1 ]
Gill, Tarunpreet Kaur
Rela, Rathi [2 ]
Vatsa, Ritesh [3 ]
Priyadarshni, Priyanka [4 ]
机构
[1] BJS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[2] Nalanda Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] Sri Krishna Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
[4] Patna Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Patna, Bihar, India
来源
关键词
Bone regeneration; collagen; dental implants; guided bone regeneration; membranes; osseointegration; BARRIER MEMBRANES; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_638_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Bone grafting aims at better dental implant osseointegration and preserves the remaining alveolar bone in the socket. The success of various bone grafting materials plays a vital role in assessing future implant function. Aims and Objectives: The present clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the results of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with and without the bioresorbable membrane in the dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: The 20 patients were divided into two groups (n = 10). First was Group I- GBR with bioresorbable collagen membrane (BioGide (TM)) and second was Group II- GBR without membrane. Bone gain and bone levels were analyzed for both groups. All the collected data were analyzed statistically. Results: For Group I, bone levels at baseline were nonsignificant (P = 0.2188) Similarly, nonsignificant values were seen in both groups at 3 months with bone level values of 0.25 +/- 0.17 and 0.38 +/- 0.24 for Group I and Group II, respectively. Changes in the bone levels were found to be 2.45 +/- 0.349 and 2.58 +/- 0.304 from Group I and II, respectively, inferring the nonsignificant difference with P value of 0.3723. The percentage of bone gain for intergroup at the end of 3 months was 89.15% +/- 0.678 for Group I and 88.68% +/- 0.503%; these values were statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.982). Conclusion: Nonsignificant difference was observed between the two groups with and without membrane in terms of changes in bone level, percentage of bone gain, and bone defect reduction. This study concludes that the use of bone grafts significantly improves residual alveolar ridge irrespective of membrane used.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 468
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of surgical template for dental implants placed in bone graft
    Ohyama, Tetsuo
    Toyoma, Hitoshi
    Nagai, Eiichi
    Ohtani, Kenji
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2009, 53 (03) : 146 - 149
  • [32] Reverse sliding onlay graft from the chin for lateral reconstruction of the alveolar ridge
    Hakim, Samer George
    Kimmerle, Harald
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 51 (08): : 978 - 980
  • [33] Immediate ridge reconstruction with a composite tuberosity graft after removal of failing implants
    Pohl, Snjezana
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2023, 13 (04) : 227 - 234
  • [34] Calvarial grafts for alveolar ridge reconstruction prior to dental implant placement: an update
    Smolka W.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2014, 18 (4) : 381 - 385
  • [35] Quality of Life After Microvascular Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Subsequent Dental Rehabilitation
    Zeman-Kuhnert, Katharina
    Gaggl, Alexander J.
    Bottini, Gian B.
    Wittig, Joern
    Steiner, Christoph
    Lauth, Wanda
    Brandtner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (20)
  • [36] Intraosseous stability of dental implants in free revascularized fibula and iliac crest bone flaps
    Moehlhenrich, Stephan Christian
    Kniha, Kristian
    Elvers, Dirk
    Ayoub, Nassim
    Goloborodko, Evgeny
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Modabber, Ali
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (12) : 1935 - 1939
  • [37] Block Allograft for Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Ridge in Implantology: A Systematic Review
    Araujo, Pryscyla P. T.
    Oliveira, Kerlison P.
    Montenegro, Sheyla C. L.
    Carreiro, Adriana F. P.
    Silva, Jose S. P.
    Germano, Adriano R.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (03) : 304 - 308
  • [38] Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: A review of the literature
    Tutak, Marcin
    Smektala, Tomasz
    Schneider, Katarzyna
    Golebiewska, Edyta
    Sporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2013, 19 : 1037 - 1042
  • [39] USE OF MARROW-BONE GRAFTS AND SUBPERIOSTEAL IMPLANTS IN RIDGE RECONSTRUCTION
    BOYNE, PJ
    KRATOCHV.FJ
    BUMP, RL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1974, 53 (FEB) : 86 - 86
  • [40] Atrophic Maxilla Reconstruction With Autogenous Iliac Graft and Guided Dental Implants
    Cunha, Giovanni
    Lefort Rocha, Audrey Foster
    Pereira Filho, Valfrido Antonio
    Real Gabrielli, Mario Francisco
    Cabrini Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (08) : 2218 - 2219