Bone Graft and Intraosseous Anchorage of Dental Implants for Reconstruction of the Residual Alveolar Ridge

被引:4
|
作者
Bali, Yashika [1 ]
Singh, Ravpreet [1 ]
Gill, Tarunpreet Kaur
Rela, Rathi [2 ]
Vatsa, Ritesh [3 ]
Priyadarshni, Priyanka [4 ]
机构
[1] BJS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[2] Nalanda Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Med & Radiol, Patna, Bihar, India
[3] Sri Krishna Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India
[4] Patna Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Patna, Bihar, India
来源
关键词
Bone regeneration; collagen; dental implants; guided bone regeneration; membranes; osseointegration; BARRIER MEMBRANES; AUGMENTATION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_638_20
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Bone grafting aims at better dental implant osseointegration and preserves the remaining alveolar bone in the socket. The success of various bone grafting materials plays a vital role in assessing future implant function. Aims and Objectives: The present clinical trial was aimed at evaluating the results of guided bone regeneration (GBR) with and without the bioresorbable membrane in the dental implant placement. Materials and Methods: The 20 patients were divided into two groups (n = 10). First was Group I- GBR with bioresorbable collagen membrane (BioGide (TM)) and second was Group II- GBR without membrane. Bone gain and bone levels were analyzed for both groups. All the collected data were analyzed statistically. Results: For Group I, bone levels at baseline were nonsignificant (P = 0.2188) Similarly, nonsignificant values were seen in both groups at 3 months with bone level values of 0.25 +/- 0.17 and 0.38 +/- 0.24 for Group I and Group II, respectively. Changes in the bone levels were found to be 2.45 +/- 0.349 and 2.58 +/- 0.304 from Group I and II, respectively, inferring the nonsignificant difference with P value of 0.3723. The percentage of bone gain for intergroup at the end of 3 months was 89.15% +/- 0.678 for Group I and 88.68% +/- 0.503%; these values were statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.982). Conclusion: Nonsignificant difference was observed between the two groups with and without membrane in terms of changes in bone level, percentage of bone gain, and bone defect reduction. This study concludes that the use of bone grafts significantly improves residual alveolar ridge irrespective of membrane used.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 468
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adjunctive use of dental implants in mandibular reconstruction with a free fibular graft
    Askew, CA
    Fleming, PS
    Downie, IP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 43 (04): : 341 - 342
  • [42] Maxillary reconstruction by bone graft and immediately osseointegrated implants.
    Pozuelo, A
    López-Martos, F
    López-Quiles, J
    Sada, JM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (05) : 1214 - 1214
  • [43] Alveolar ridge preservation with bone graft may limit physiological ridge loss after tooth extraction
    Cheng, Linda L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 147 (03): : 204 - 206
  • [44] Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh and Autogenous Particulate Bone Graft: Computed Tomography-Based Evaluations of Augmented Bone Quality and Quantity
    Miyamoto, Ikuya
    Funaki, Katsuyuki
    Yamauchi, Kensuke
    Kodama, Takashi
    Takahashi, Tetsu
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (02) : 304 - 311
  • [45] ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION WITH AN AUTOGENOUS CANCELLOUS BONE AND MARROW GRAFT - PRELIMINARY REPORT
    BIRD, JS
    KULLBOM, TL
    QUAST, GL
    JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1974, 32 (10): : 773 - 776
  • [46] BONE-DENSITY AND SERUM MINERALS IN CASES OF RESIDUAL ALVEOLAR RIDGE ATROPHY
    MERCIER, P
    INOUE, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1981, 46 (03): : 250 - 255
  • [47] Dental prosthetic reconstruction of osseointegrated implants placed in irradiated bone
    Brogniez, V
    Lejuste, P
    Pecheur, A
    Reychler, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (04) : 506 - 512
  • [48] Changes in alveolar bone height and width following ridge augmentation using bone graft and membranes
    Simon, BI
    Von Hagen, S
    Deasy, MJ
    Faldu, M
    Resnansky, D
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2000, 71 (11) : 1774 - 1791
  • [50] Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation
    Hadzik, Jakub
    Krawiec, Maciej
    Kubasiewicz-Ross, Pawel
    Prylinska-Czyzewska, Agata
    Gedrange, Tomasz
    Dominiak, Marzena
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 5645 - 5652