Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer

被引:114
|
作者
Hansen, Nienke L. [1 ,13 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesch, Claudia [4 ]
Pepdjonovic, Lana [5 ,6 ]
Bonekamp, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ,9 ]
Distler, Florian [4 ]
Warren, Anne [1 ,3 ,10 ]
Samel, Christina [11 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [4 ,14 ]
Grummet, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Australian Urol Associates, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Healthcare Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[11] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[12] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[13] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
transperineal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; prostate biopsy; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; FUSION; MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the detection rates of primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using combined targeted and systematic core distribution in three tertiary referral centres. Patients and MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective outcome study, 807 consecutive biopsy-naive patients underwent MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, as the first diagnostic intervention, between 10/2012 and 05/2016. MRI was reported following the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria. In all, 236 patients had 18-24 systematic transperineal biopsies only, and 571 patients underwent additional targeted biopsies either by MRI-fusion or cognitive targeting if PI-RADS 3 lesions were present. Detection rates for any and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in targeted and overall biopsy were calculated and predictive values were calculated for different PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD) groups. ResultsCancer was detected in 68% of the patients (546/807) and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in 49% (392/807). The negative predictive value of 236 PI-RADS 1-2 MRI in combination with PSAD of <0.1ng/mL/mL for Gleason score 7-10 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.07, 8% of study population). In 418 patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions using targeted plus systematic biopsies, the cancer detection rate of Gleason score 7-10 was significantly higher at 71% vs 59% and 61% with either approach alone (P < 0.001). For 153 PI-RADS 3 lesions, the detection rate was 31% with no significant difference to systematic biopsies with 27% (P > 0.05). Limitations include variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) reading and Gleason grading. ConclusionMRI-based transperineal biopsy performed at high-volume tertiary care centres with a significant experience of prostate mpMRI and image-guided targeted biopsies yielded high detection rates of Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Prostate biopsies may not be needed for men with low PSAD and an unsuspicious MRI. In patients with high probability lesions, combined targeted and systematic biopsies are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Editorial Comment from Dr Ukimura to Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Ukimura, Osamu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 146 - 147
  • [32] Use of Prostate Systematic and Targeted Biopsy on the Basis of Bi-Parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Biopsy-Naive Patients
    Cheng, Yifei
    Qi, Feng
    Liang, Linghui
    Zhang, Lei
    Cao, Dongliang
    Hua, Lixin
    Cheng, Gong
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (01) : 92 - 97
  • [33] Combined Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study in a Biopsy-naive Patient Population
    Fascelli, Michele
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Brown, Anna M.
    George, Arvin K.
    Ho, Richard
    Frye, Thomas
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Chelluri, Raju
    Abboud, Steven
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    UROLOGY, 2016, 88 : 125 - 132
  • [34] Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men
    Knaapila, Juha
    Autio, Venla
    Jambor, Ivan
    Ettala, Otto
    Verho, Janne
    Kiyiniemi, Aida
    Taimen, Pekka
    Perez, Ileana Montoya
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Syvanen, Kari T.
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [35] The role of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive prostate cancer
    Amir H. Lebastchi
    Peter A. Pinto
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2019, 16 : 276 - 277
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy
    Truong, Matthew
    Frye, Thomas P.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 424 - 431
  • [37] Reliability of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Previous Negative Biopsy: Comparison with Biopsy-Naive Patients in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Barone, Biagio
    Napolitano, Luigi
    Calace, Francesco Paolo
    Del Biondo, Dario
    Napodano, Giorgio
    Grillo, Marco
    Reccia, Pasquale
    De Luca, Luigi
    Prezioso, Domenico
    Muto, Matteo
    Crocetto, Felice
    Ferro, Matteo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [38] Re: Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ravery, Vincent
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) : 337 - 337
  • [39] Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naive Men
    Russo, Filippo
    Mazzetti, Simone
    Regge, Daniele
    Ambrosini, Ilaria
    Giannini, Valentina
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Luca, Stefano
    Bollito, Enrico
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 855 - 862
  • [40] WHICH BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN BENEFIT FROM PRE-BIOPSY PROSTATE MRI
    Boesen, Lars
    Logager, Vibeke
    Norgaard, Nis
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Thomsen, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E184 - E184