Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naive men

被引:3
|
作者
Knaapila, Juha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Autio, Venla [1 ,2 ]
Jambor, Ivan [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ettala, Otto [1 ,2 ]
Verho, Janne [4 ,6 ]
Kiyiniemi, Aida [4 ,6 ]
Taimen, Pekka [7 ,8 ]
Perez, Ileana Montoya [4 ,9 ]
Aronen, Hannu J. [4 ,6 ]
Syvanen, Kari T. [1 ,2 ]
Bostrom, Peter J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Urol, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8,Rakennus 7A,2 Krs, Turku 20521, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Satakunta Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Pori, Finland
[4] Univ Turku, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Turku, Finland
[5] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[6] Turku Univ Hosp, Med Imaging Ctr Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland
[7] Univ Turku, Inst Biomed, Turku, Finland
[8] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Turku, Finland
[9] Univ Turku, Dept Future Technol, Turku, Finland
关键词
Clinically significant; prostate cancer; biparametric; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; sensitivity; diagnostics; GRADING SYSTEM; COMPLICATIONS; PATHOLOGY; MRI;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2019.1711161
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in men with biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesion-targeted biopsies (TBs) to the group of men without prebiopsy MRI in an initial biopsy session. Methods: The MRI group consists of men enrolled into four prospective clinical trials investigating a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and TB while the non-MRI group was a retrospective cohort of men collected from an era prior to a clinical use of a prostate MRI. All men had standard biopsies (SBs). In the MRI group, men had additional TBs from potential cancer-suspicious lesions. CSPCa was defined as Gleason score >= 3 + 4 in any biopsy core taken. All the patients were prostate biopsy naive. Results: The MRI group consists of 507 while the non-MRI group 379 men. Mean age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the groups: In the MRI group, 64 years and 7.6 ng/ml, respectively, and in the non-MRI group 68 years and 8.2 ng/ml, respectively. Significantly (p < 0.05) more CSPCa was diagnosed with initial biopsies in the MRI group (48%) compared to non-MRI group (34%). In men with no CSPCa diagnosed during the initial biopsies, significantly fewer (p < 0.05) men had upgrading re-biopsies in the MRI group (5%) than in the non-MRI group (19%) during the follow up. Conclusions: Prebiopsy bpMRI with TBs combined with SBs could lead to earlier diagnoses of CSPCa compared with men without prebiopsy prostate MRI used in initial PCa diagnostics.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients
    Hu, Beibei
    Zhang, Huili
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Jin, Yongming
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Bisbjerg, Rasmus
    Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie
    Winther, Mads D.
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (02)
  • [3] Should Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging be Offered to All Biopsy-naive Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy?
    Ahmad, Ardalan E.
    Finelli, Antonio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 426 - 427
  • [4] Evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer using biparametric magnetic resonance imaging: An evolving concept
    Mahajan, Manik
    Gupta, Vikrant
    Gupta, Puneet
    Sharma, Poonam
    Abrol, Deepak
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1640 - 1645
  • [5] Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naive Men
    Boesen, Lars
    Norgaard, Nis
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Bisbjerg, Rasmus
    Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie
    Jakobsen, Henrik
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (03): : 311 - 319
  • [6] Nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS-3 biparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Liang, Zhen
    Feng, Tianrui
    Zhou, Yi
    Yang, Yongjiao
    Sun, Yujiao
    Zhou, Zhien
    Yan, Weigang
    Cao, Fenghong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [7] Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Nomogram to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Targeted Biopsy for Index Lesion
    Kim, Min Je
    Park, Sung Yoon
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 55 (04) : 1226 - 1233
  • [8] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
    Beibei Hu
    Huili Zhang
    Yueyue Zhang
    Yongming Jin
    Cancer Imaging, 23
  • [9] MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy
    Huang, Cong
    Song, Gang
    Wang, He
    Ji, Guangjie
    Li, Jie
    Chen, Yuke
    Fan, Yu
    Fang, Dong
    Xiong, Gengyan
    Xin, Zhongcheng
    Zhou, Liqun
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [10] Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States
    Liu, Wen
    Patil, Dattatraya
    Howard, David H.
    Moore, Renee H.
    Wang, Heqiong
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Filson, Christopher P.
    UROLOGY, 2018, 117 : 57 - 63