Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer

被引:114
|
作者
Hansen, Nienke L. [1 ,13 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesch, Claudia [4 ]
Pepdjonovic, Lana [5 ,6 ]
Bonekamp, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ,9 ]
Distler, Florian [4 ]
Warren, Anne [1 ,3 ,10 ]
Samel, Christina [11 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [4 ,14 ]
Grummet, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Australian Urol Associates, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Healthcare Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[11] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[12] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[13] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
transperineal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; prostate biopsy; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; FUSION; MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the detection rates of primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using combined targeted and systematic core distribution in three tertiary referral centres. Patients and MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective outcome study, 807 consecutive biopsy-naive patients underwent MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, as the first diagnostic intervention, between 10/2012 and 05/2016. MRI was reported following the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria. In all, 236 patients had 18-24 systematic transperineal biopsies only, and 571 patients underwent additional targeted biopsies either by MRI-fusion or cognitive targeting if PI-RADS 3 lesions were present. Detection rates for any and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in targeted and overall biopsy were calculated and predictive values were calculated for different PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD) groups. ResultsCancer was detected in 68% of the patients (546/807) and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in 49% (392/807). The negative predictive value of 236 PI-RADS 1-2 MRI in combination with PSAD of <0.1ng/mL/mL for Gleason score 7-10 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.07, 8% of study population). In 418 patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions using targeted plus systematic biopsies, the cancer detection rate of Gleason score 7-10 was significantly higher at 71% vs 59% and 61% with either approach alone (P < 0.001). For 153 PI-RADS 3 lesions, the detection rate was 31% with no significant difference to systematic biopsies with 27% (P > 0.05). Limitations include variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) reading and Gleason grading. ConclusionMRI-based transperineal biopsy performed at high-volume tertiary care centres with a significant experience of prostate mpMRI and image-guided targeted biopsies yielded high detection rates of Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Prostate biopsies may not be needed for men with low PSAD and an unsuspicious MRI. In patients with high probability lesions, combined targeted and systematic biopsies are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Presence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Suspicious Lesion Predicts Gleason 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Patients
    Weaver, John K.
    Kim, Eric H.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Siegel, Cary L.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 88 : 119 - 124
  • [42] Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naive Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Gayet, Maudy
    Verbeek, Jan F.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R. W.
    Savci-Heijink, C. Dilara
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Gielens, Maaike P. M.
    van der Linden, Hans
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (02): : 109 - 117
  • [43] Transperineal or Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Diamand, Romain
    Guenzel, Karsten
    Mjaess, Georges
    Lefebvre, Yolene
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Fournier, Georges
    Buif, Alexandre-Patrick
    Tahaf, Fayek
    Oderdag, Marco
    Gonterog, Paolo
    Rysankovah, Katerina
    Bernal-Gomezj, Adrian
    Rochej, Jean-Baptiste
    Fiard, Gaelle
    Abou Zahr, Rawad
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Mastrorosaj, Alessandro
    Windisch, Olivier
    Novello, Quentin
    Benamran, Daniel
    Delavar, Gina
    Anract, Julien
    Delongchamps, Nicolas Barry
    Halinski, Adam
    Dariane, Charles
    Benijts, Jan
    Assenmacher, Gregoire
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Peltier, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (05): : 805 - 811
  • [44] Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Targeted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Fusion
    Dragoescu, Petru Octavian
    Drocas, Andrei Ioan
    Dragoescu, Alice Nicoleta
    Padureanu, Vlad
    Panus, Andrei
    Stanculescu, Andreea Doriana
    Radu, Mihai Alexandru
    Florescu, Lucian Mihai
    Gheonea, Ioana Andreea
    Mirea, Cecil
    Mitroi, George
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [45] Combined Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study in a Biopsy-naive Patient Population REPLY
    George, Arvin K.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Fascelli, Michele
    Turkbeyc, Baris
    UROLOGY, 2016, 88 : 133 - 134
  • [46] Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided In-bore Prostate Biopsy versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy Naive Men with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen
    Quentin, Michael
    Blondin, Dirk
    Arsov, Christian
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Hiester, Andreas
    Godehardt, Erhard
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Rabenalt, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05): : 1374 - 1379
  • [48] NEW DIAGNOSTIC PATHWAY IN BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN WITH SUSPECTED PROSTATE CANCER: THE ROLE OF BIPARAMETRIC PROSTATE MRI
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    De Luca, Stefano
    Russo, Filippo
    Bollito, Enrico
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Garrou, Diletta
    Niculescu, Razvan G.
    Fiori, Christian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (08) : 4595 - 4596
  • [49] Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy versus Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy in the Detection of Localised Radio-recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Kanthabalan, A.
    Abd-Alazeez, M.
    Arya, M.
    Allen, C.
    Freeman, A.
    Jameson, C.
    Kirkham, A.
    Mitra, A. V.
    Payne, H.
    Punwani, S.
    Ramachandran, N.
    Walkden, M.
    Emberton, M.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 568 - 576
  • [50] Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy
    D'Amico, AV
    Tempany, CM
    Cormack, R
    Hata, N
    Jinzaki, M
    Tuncali, K
    Weinstein, M
    Richie, JP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02): : 385 - 387