Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naive men with suspicion of prostate cancer

被引:114
|
作者
Hansen, Nienke L. [1 ,13 ]
Barrett, Tristan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kesch, Claudia [4 ]
Pepdjonovic, Lana [5 ,6 ]
Bonekamp, David [7 ]
O'Sullivan, Richard [8 ,9 ]
Distler, Florian [4 ]
Warren, Anne [1 ,3 ,10 ]
Samel, Christina [11 ]
Hadaschik, Boris [4 ,14 ]
Grummet, Jeremy [5 ,6 ]
Kastner, Christof [1 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, CamPARI Clin, Cambridge, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Urol, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Australian Urol Associates, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Cent Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Healthcare Imaging, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[10] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Pathol, Cambridge, England
[11] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Med Stat Informat & Epidemiol, Cologne, Germany
[12] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[13] Univ Hosp Cologne, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
transperineal; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; prostate biopsy; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BIOPSY; TARGETED BIOPSY; REPEAT BIOPSY; FUSION; MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; HISTOPATHOLOGY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bju.14049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo analyse the detection rates of primary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion transperineal prostate biopsy using combined targeted and systematic core distribution in three tertiary referral centres. Patients and MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective outcome study, 807 consecutive biopsy-naive patients underwent MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy, as the first diagnostic intervention, between 10/2012 and 05/2016. MRI was reported following the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) criteria. In all, 236 patients had 18-24 systematic transperineal biopsies only, and 571 patients underwent additional targeted biopsies either by MRI-fusion or cognitive targeting if PI-RADS 3 lesions were present. Detection rates for any and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in targeted and overall biopsy were calculated and predictive values were calculated for different PI-RADS and PSA density (PSAD) groups. ResultsCancer was detected in 68% of the patients (546/807) and Gleason score 7-10 cancer in 49% (392/807). The negative predictive value of 236 PI-RADS 1-2 MRI in combination with PSAD of <0.1ng/mL/mL for Gleason score 7-10 was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.07, 8% of study population). In 418 patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions using targeted plus systematic biopsies, the cancer detection rate of Gleason score 7-10 was significantly higher at 71% vs 59% and 61% with either approach alone (P < 0.001). For 153 PI-RADS 3 lesions, the detection rate was 31% with no significant difference to systematic biopsies with 27% (P > 0.05). Limitations include variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) reading and Gleason grading. ConclusionMRI-based transperineal biopsy performed at high-volume tertiary care centres with a significant experience of prostate mpMRI and image-guided targeted biopsies yielded high detection rates of Gleason score 7-10 cancer. Prostate biopsies may not be needed for men with low PSAD and an unsuspicious MRI. In patients with high probability lesions, combined targeted and systematic biopsies are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naive patients
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Platzek, Ivan
    Toma, Marieta
    Torsev, Georgi
    Renner, Theresa
    Herout, Roman
    Baunacke, Martin
    Laniado, Michael
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Kesch, Claudia
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Froehner, Michael
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Wirth, Manfred
    Zastrow, Stefan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [22] High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naive Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility
    van der Leest, Marloes
    Israel, Bas
    Cornel, Erik Bastiaan
    Zamecnik, Patrik
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    van der Lelij, Hans
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Rovers, Maroeska
    van Oort, Inge
    Sedelaar, Michiel
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina
    Hannink, Gerjon
    Veltman, Jeroen
    Barentsz, Jelle
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (05) : 574 - 581
  • [23] Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Chen, Jie
    Lin, Zhengyu
    Chen, Jin
    Lin, Qingfeng
    Chen, Jian
    Yan, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (02) : 394 - 397
  • [24] TARGETED VS STANDARD PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL IN BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN
    Elkhoury, Fuad
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Kwan, Lorna
    Felker, Ely
    Delfin, Merdie
    Sisk, Anthony
    Marks, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E480 - E480
  • [25] Fusion-targeted biopsy significantly improves prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naive men
    Teishima, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (07) : 604 - 605
  • [26] The impact of prostate volume on prostate cancer detection: Comparing MRI with TRUS in biopsy-naive men
    Jianjun, Y.
    Qiang, W.
    Yige, B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1601 - S1601
  • [27] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients
    Hu, Beibei
    Zhang, Huili
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Jin, Yongming
    CANCER IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [28] Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Image Targeted Prostate Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Prostate Biopsy in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 866 - 866
  • [29] Editorial Comment from Dr Shiota to Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy
    Shiota, Masaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (02) : 147 - 148
  • [30] MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men Response
    Pahwa, Shivani
    Schiltz, Nicholas K.
    Ponsky, Lee E.
    Lu, Ziang
    Griswold, Mark A.
    Gulani, Vikas
    RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (03) : 1053 - 1053